Literature DB >> 22324004

Analysis of the embrasure dimensions between maxillary central incisors in relation to the topography of the interdental papilla.

Sun-A Kim1, Seung-Suk Choi, Soo-Jung Byun, Moontaek Chang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze the dimensions of the embrasure space between the maxillary central incisors as potential factors influencing interdental papilla fill and height.
METHODS: The embrasure dimensions between the maxillary central incisors of 100 subjects (40 females/60 males) were assessed with clinical, study model, and radiographic examinations. Variables of the complete and deficient papilla fill groups were compared. Multiple regression analyses were performed to investigate potential influence of the distance between the contact point and bone crest (CP_BC), horizontal interdental distance (HID), and facio-lingual thickness (FLT) at the papilla base on complete/deficient papilla fill and papilla height (PH).
RESULTS: CP_BC was the only variable that showed a significant difference between the complete and deficient papilla groups (P<0.05). When the CP_BC was less than 5 mm, the embrasure spaces between the maxillary central incisors were completely filled with interdental papilla. Multiple regression analyses revealed that a significant predictor for complete/deficient papilla fill was CP_BC, and significant predictors for PH were CP_BC and HID (P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The chances of complete papilla fill increased as CP_BC decreased, while PH increased as CP_BC and HID increased. However, the FLT of the papilla base did not appear to affect papilla fill or PH. From an esthetic perspective, CP_BC as well as HID should be considered as factors influencing the topography of interdental papilla.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dental esthetics; Gingiva

Year:  2011        PMID: 22324004      PMCID: PMC3259235          DOI: 10.5051/jpis.2011.41.6.273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci        ISSN: 2093-2278            Impact factor:   2.614


  15 in total

1.  Open gingival embrasures after orthodontic treatment in adults: prevalence and etiology.

Authors:  J R Kurth; V G Kokich
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Effect of the vertical and horizontal distances between adjacent implants and between a tooth and an implant on the incidence of interproximal papilla.

Authors:  Jose Fabio Gastaldo; Patricia Ramos Cury; Wilson Roberto Sendyk
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.993

3.  The effects of interproximal distance between roots on the existence of interdental papillae according to the distance from the contact point to the alveolar crest.

Authors:  Hae-Sung Cho; Hyun-Seon Jang; Dong-Kie Kim; Joo-Cheol Park; Heung-Joong Kim; Seong-Ho Choi; Chong-Kwan Kim; Byung-Ock Kim
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.993

4.  Regeneration of gingival papillae after single-implant treatment.

Authors:  T Jemt
Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Aesthetic peri-implant site development. The restorative connection.

Authors:  K Phillips; J C Kois
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  1998-01

Review 6.  Mucogingival considerations in orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  J L Wennström
Journal:  Semin Orthod       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 0.970

7.  Factors associated with the interdental papilla height between two maxillary central incisors: a radiographic study.

Authors:  Li-Ching Chang
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 6.993

8.  Assessment of parameters affecting the presence of the central papilla using a non-invasive radiographic method.

Authors:  Li-Ching Chang
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 6.993

9.  The effect of the distance from the contact point to the crest of bone on the presence or absence of the interproximal dental papilla.

Authors:  D P Tarnow; A W Magner; P Fletcher
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 6.993

10.  Morphometric study of the interproximal unit in the esthetic region to correlate anatomic variables affecting the aspect of soft tissue embrasure space.

Authors:  P Martegani; M Silvestri; F Mascarello; T Scipioni; C Ghezzi; C Rota; V Cattaneo
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 6.993

View more
  3 in total

1.  Evaluation of Proportion between Incisal Edge to Gingival Zenith Distance and Interdental Papilla in Maxillary Anterior Dentition of Indian Population.

Authors:  Gopi Naveen Chander; Anand Damodaran; Muthukumar Balasubramanium
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-03-01

2.  Measurements of the gingival papillae architecture using cone-beam computed tomography in young Chinese adults.

Authors:  Gang Yang; Jie Cao; Wenjie Hu; Kwok-Hung Chung
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  The influence of gingival phenotype on the morphology of the maxillary central papilla.

Authors:  Šimon Belák; Radovan Žižka; Martin Starosta; Jana Zapletalová; Jiří Šedý; Michal Štefanatný
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 2.757

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.