OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the agreement between body mass index, calf circumference, arm circumference, habitual energy intake and the mini nutritional assessment (MNA) and then assess the accuracy of these parameters in relation to the MNA. METHOD: The nutritional status of 132 hospitalized elderly was assessed with the MNA, body mass index (BMI), calf circumference (CC) and arm circumference (AC). Their habitual energy intake (HEI) was also determined. The chi-square and the Mann-Whitney tests were used. The agreement between the nutritional risk criteria and the MNA was determined by the Kappa coefficient. The ROC curve was used to determine the accuracy of the parameters in relation to the MNA and to determine the cut-off values. The significance level was set at 5% (p<0.05). RESULTS: A little more than half the sample (54.5%) was well nourished, 34.9% were at risk of malnutrition and 10.6% were malnourished. There was good agreement only for BMI<22 (Kappa=0.44), with an accuracy (AUC) of 0.78. No agreement was found for the other parameters, their sensitivities were shown to be low. However, CC and AC were very specific for determining the well nourished patients: the CC specificity was 86.1% and AC specificity was 94.4%. The cut-off values determined by the ROC curve were ≤23.2 for BMI, ≤26.2 for AC and ≤32.2 for CC. CONCLUSION: The best parameters to determine nutritional risk in relation to the MNA were AC, BMI and CC. However, these nutritional assessment parameters should be used to replace the MNA for the assessment of hospitalized elderly patients with their current cut-off points.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the agreement between body mass index, calf circumference, arm circumference, habitual energy intake and the mini nutritional assessment (MNA) and then assess the accuracy of these parameters in relation to the MNA. METHOD: The nutritional status of 132 hospitalized elderly was assessed with the MNA, body mass index (BMI), calf circumference (CC) and arm circumference (AC). Their habitual energy intake (HEI) was also determined. The chi-square and the Mann-Whitney tests were used. The agreement between the nutritional risk criteria and the MNA was determined by the Kappa coefficient. The ROC curve was used to determine the accuracy of the parameters in relation to the MNA and to determine the cut-off values. The significance level was set at 5% (p<0.05). RESULTS: A little more than half the sample (54.5%) was well nourished, 34.9% were at risk of malnutrition and 10.6% were malnourished. There was good agreement only for BMI<22 (Kappa=0.44), with an accuracy (AUC) of 0.78. No agreement was found for the other parameters, their sensitivities were shown to be low. However, CC and AC were very specific for determining the well nourished patients: the CC specificity was 86.1% and AC specificity was 94.4%. The cut-off values determined by the ROC curve were ≤23.2 for BMI, ≤26.2 for AC and ≤32.2 for CC. CONCLUSION: The best parameters to determine nutritional risk in relation to the MNA were AC, BMI and CC. However, these nutritional assessment parameters should be used to replace the MNA for the assessment of hospitalized elderly patients with their current cut-off points.
Authors: Margareta D Persson; Kerstin E Brismar; Krassimir S Katzarski; Jörgen Nordenström; Tommy E Cederholm Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: J van Steijn; B van Harten; E Flapper; E Droogsma; P van Walderveen; M Blaauw; D van Asselt Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2014 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: L M Donini; E Poggiogalle; A Morrone; P Scardella; L Piombo; B Neri; E Cava; D Cucinotta; M Barbagallo; A Pinto Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 4.075