Literature DB >> 22322372

Translaminar screw fixation in the subaxial cervical spine: quantitative laminar analysis and feasibility of unilateral and bilateral translaminar virtual screw placement.

Matthew D Alvin1, Kalil G Abdullah, Michael P Steinmetz, Daniel Lubelski, Amy S Nowacki, Edward C Benzel, Thomas E Mroz.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Morphometric and volumetric analyses and virtual screw placement.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to (1) define the morphometric and volumetric dimensions of the laminae of C3-C7 and (2) analyze the feasibility of unilateral and bilateral translaminar screw placement at C3-C7. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies on translaminar screw fixation have primarily focused on upper cervical and thoracic fixation. Most studies have been conducted on the subaxial cervical vertebrae in the pediatric population and a few in the adult population. In this study, we used computed tomographic (CT) scans to calculate the spatial anatomical environment for translaminar screws at C3-C7. We also determined the feasibility of translaminar screw placement at C3-C7 for clinical applicability.
METHODS: Morphometric and volumetric analyses were performed on CT scans of the C3-C7 laminae in 25 male and 25 female patients. A total of 2000 morphometric and 1000 volumetric measurements were performed. The feasibility analysis was performed using unilateral and bilateral virtual screw placement via BrainLAB software (BrainLAB AG, Heimstetten, Germany) on the same CT scans.
RESULTS: Male patients had significantly (P < 0.05) longer translaminar lengths (C5-C7), sagittal-diagonal measurements (C3-C7), and larger volumes (C6-C7) than female patients. Unilaterally, C7 showed 3.5-mm translaminar screw acceptance rates of 100%, C6 showed high acceptance rates (>64%), and C3-C5 showed lower acceptance rates (<52%). C7 accepted bilateral placement at a high rate (96% men, 84% women). C3 and C6 accepted bilateral screws at low placement rates (8%-24%). C4 and C5 never accepted bilateral translaminar screw placement.
CONCLUSION: Subaxial cervical unilateral translaminar screw placement is a potentially safe and effective technique to use in conjunction with preoperative CT scanning for all vertebral levels. The same is true for bilateral placement at C7 but not at C3-C6. A prospective study to evaluate the long-term outcomes of translaminar fixation at all vertebral levels is currently underway.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22322372     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824c70ef

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  16 in total

Review 1.  Use of intraoperative fluoroscopy for the safe placement of C2 laminar screws: technical note.

Authors:  John A Engler; Michael L Smith
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Modified translaminar screw fixation in the cervicothoracic junction (C7-T2): a technical note.

Authors:  Dong-Dong Xia; Mei-Jun Yan; Jing-Jie Zhang; Feng Zhou; Hong-Ming Xu; Yong-Li Wang; Jun Tan; Xiang-Yang Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-01-30       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Posterior Fusion for the Subaxial Cervical Spine: A Review of the Major Techniques.

Authors:  Christopher M Mikhail; James E Dowdell; Andrew C Hecht
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2019-10-25

4.  C7 intra-laminar screws for complex cervicothoracic spine surgery-a case series.

Authors:  Peter John Wilson; Michael Derrick Selby
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-12

5.  Morphological study of the posterior osseous structures of subaxial cervical spine in a population from northeastern China.

Authors:  Zhenyu Wang; Jiali Leng; Jianhua Liu; Yi Liu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Feasibility of translaminar screw placement in Korean population: morphometric analysis of cervical spine.

Authors:  Gyu Yeul Ji; Chang Hyun Oh; Sang Hyuk Park; Ferry Kurniawan; Junho Lee; Jae Kyun Jeon; Dong Ah Shin; Keung Nyun Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.759

7.  CT-based morphometric analysis of C1 laminar dimensions: C1 translaminar screw fixation is a feasible technique for salvage of atlantoaxial fusions.

Authors:  Andrew Yew; Derek Lu; Daniel C Lu
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2015-05-07

8.  Ideal T1 laminar screw fixation based on computed tomography morphometry.

Authors:  Xiao-Bo Wang; Xin Zheng; Hou-Qing Long; Wen-Li Chen; Xing Cheng; Yang-Liang Huang; Jing-Hui Xu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  The accuracy of a method for printing three-dimensional spinal models.

Authors:  Ai-Min Wu; Zhen-Xuan Shao; Jian-Shun Wang; Xin-Dong Yang; Wan-Qing Weng; Xiang-Yang Wang; Hua-Zi Xu; Yong-Long Chi; Zhong-Ke Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Posterior Fixation Techniques in the Subaxial Cervical Spine.

Authors:  Ahmer Ghori; Hai V Le; Heeren Makanji; Thomas Cha
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2015-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.