Literature DB >> 22322366

Rate-dependent effects of vernakalant in the isolated non-remodeled canine left atria are primarily due to block of the sodium channel: comparison with ranolazine and dl-sotalol.

Alexander Burashnikov1, Marc Pourrier, John K Gibson, Joseph J Lynch, Charles Antzelevitch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several clinical trials have shown that vernakalant is effective in terminating recent onset atrial fibrillation (AF). The electrophysiological actions of vernakalant are not fully understood. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Here we report the results of a blinded study comparing the in vitro canine atrial electrophysiological effects of vernakalant, ranolazine, and dl-sotalol. Action potential durations (APD(50,75,90)), effective refractory period (ERP), post repolarization refractoriness (PRR), maximum rate of rise of the action potential (AP) upstroke (V(max)), diastolic threshold of excitation (DTE), conduction time (CT), and the shortest S(1)-S(1) permitting 1:1 activation (S(1)-S(1)) were measured using standard stimulation and microelectrode recording techniques in isolated normal, non-remodeled canine arterially perfused left atrial preparations. Vernakalant caused variable but slight prolongation of APD(90) (P=not significant), but significant prolongation of APD(50) at 30 μmol/L and rapid rates. In contrast, ranolazine and dl-sotalol produced consistent concentration- and reverse rate-dependent prolongation of APD(90). Vernakalant and ranolazine caused rate-dependent, whereas dl-sotalol caused reverse rate-dependent, prolongation of ERP. Significant rate-dependent PRR developed with vernakalant and ranolazine, but not with dl-sotalol. Other sodium channel-mediated parameters (ie, V(max), CT, DTE, and S(1)-S(1)) also were depressed significantly by vernakalant and ranolazine, but not by dl-sotalol. Only vernakalant elevated AP plateau voltage, consistent with blockade of ultrarapid delayed rectified potassium current and transient outward potassium current.
CONCLUSIONS: In isolated canine left atria, the effects of vernakalant and ranolazine were characterized by use-dependent inhibition of sodium channel-mediated parameters, and those of dl-sotalol by reverse rate-dependent prolongation of APD(90) and ERP. This suggests that during the rapid activation rates of AF, the I(Na) blocking action of the mixed ion channel blocker vernakalant takes prominence. This mechanism may explain vernakalant's anti-AF efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22322366      PMCID: PMC3329593          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.111.968305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1941-3084


  38 in total

1.  Frequency-dependent electrophysiological effects of flecainide, nifekalant and d,l-sotalol on the human atrium.

Authors:  H Watanabe; I Watanabe; T Nakai; N Oshikawa; S Kunimoto; R Masaki; T Kojima; S Saito; Y Ozawa; K Kanmatuse
Journal:  Jpn Circ J       Date:  2001-01

2.  Ionic targets for drug therapy and atrial fibrillation-induced electrical remodeling: insights from a mathematical model.

Authors:  M Courtemanche; R J Ramirez; S Nattel
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 10.787

Review 3.  Basic concepts in cellular cardiac electrophysiology: Part II: Block of ion channels by antiarrhythmic drugs.

Authors:  D W Whalley; D J Wendt; A O Grant
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 1.976

4.  The repolarization-excitability relationship in the human right atrium is unaffected by cycle length, recording site and prior arrhythmias.

Authors:  F Bode; M Kilborn; P Karasik; M R Franz
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  A randomized, placebo-controlled study of vernakalant (oral) for the prevention of atrial fibrillation recurrence after cardioversion.

Authors:  Christian Torp-Pedersen; Dimitar H Raev; Garth Dickinson; Noam N Butterfield; Brian Mangal; Gregory N Beatch
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-08-14

6.  Electrophysiologic and voltage clamp analysis of the effects of sotalol on isolated cardiac muscle and Purkinje fibers.

Authors:  E Carmeliet
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 4.030

7.  Transmembrane action potential heterogeneity in the canine isolated arterially perfused right atrium: effect of IKr and IKur/Ito block.

Authors:  Alexander Burashnikov; Sandeep Mannava; Charles Antzelevitch
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.733

8.  Sustained depolarization-induced outward current in human atrial myocytes. Evidence for a novel delayed rectifier K+ current similar to Kv1.5 cloned channel currents.

Authors:  Z Wang; B Fermini; S Nattel
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 17.367

9.  Role of IKur in controlling action potential shape and contractility in the human atrium: influence of chronic atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Erich Wettwer; Ottó Hála; Torsten Christ; Jürgen F Heubach; Dobromir Dobrev; Michael Knaut; András Varró; Ursula Ravens
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-10-11       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Electrophysiologic actions of dl-sotalol in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Hung-Fat Tse; Chu-Pak Lau
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Antiarrhythmic drugs 2013: state of the art.

Authors:  Kapil Kumar; Peter J Zimetbaum
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Role of late sodium channel current block in the management of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Alexander Burashnikov; Charles Antzelevitch
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.727

3.  Atrial-selective prolongation of refractory period with AVE0118 is due principally to inhibition of sodium channel activity.

Authors:  Alexander Burashnikov; Hector Barajas-Martinez; Dan Hu; Eyal Nof; Jonathan Blazek; Charles Antzelevitch
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.105

4.  Vernakalant versus ibutilide for immediate conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  I Vogiatzis; E Papavasiliou; I Dapcevitch; S Pittas; E Koulouris
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 0.471

Review 5.  Atrial selectivity of antiarrhythmic drugs.

Authors:  Ursula Ravens; Claire Poulet; Erich Wettwer; Michael Knaut
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 6.  Vernakalant for the conversion of atrial fibrillation: the new kid on the block?

Authors:  Diego Conde; Adrian Baranchuk
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 1.468

7.  Mechanisms underlying atrial-selective block of sodium channels by Wenxin Keli: Experimental and theoretical analysis.

Authors:  Dan Hu; Hector Barajas-Martínez; Alexander Burashnikov; Brian K Panama; Jonathan M Cordeiro; Charles Antzelevitch
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 4.164

8.  The Small Conductance Calcium-Activated Potassium Channel Inhibitors NS8593 and UCL1684 Prevent the Development of Atrial Fibrillation Through Atrial-Selective Inhibition of Sodium Channel Activity.

Authors:  Alexander Burashnikov; Hector Barajas-Martinez; Dan Hu; Victoria M Robinson; Morten Grunnet; Charles Antzelevitch
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 9.  Role of Calcium-activated Potassium Channels in Atrial Fibrillation Pathophysiology and Therapy.

Authors:  Jonas G Diness; Bo H Bentzen; Ulrik S Sørensen; Morten Grunnet
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.105

Review 10.  Safety and efficacy of vernakalant for acute cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: an update.

Authors:  Yukiomi Tsuji; Dobromir Dobrev
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2013-04-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.