BACKGROUND: Anxiety is relatively common in depression and capable of modifying the severity and course of depression. Yet our understanding of how anxiety modulates frontal and limbic activation in depression is limited. METHODS: We used functional magnetic resonance imaging and two emotional information processing tasks to examine frontal and limbic activation in ten patients with major depression and comorbid with preceding generalized anxiety (MDD/GAD) and ten non-depressed controls. RESULTS: Consistent with prior studies on depression, MDD/GAD patients showed hypoactivation in medial and middle frontal regions, as well as in the anterior cingulate, cingulate and insula. However, heightened anxiety in MDD/GAD patients was associated with increased activation in middle frontal regions and the insula and the effects varied with the type of emotional information presented. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight frontal and limbic hypoactivation in patients with depression and comorbid anxiety and indicate that anxiety level may modulate frontal and limbic activation depending upon the emotional context. One implication of this finding is that divergent findings reported in the imaging literature on depression could reflect modulation of activation by anxiety level in response to different types of emotional information.
BACKGROUND:Anxiety is relatively common in depression and capable of modifying the severity and course of depression. Yet our understanding of how anxiety modulates frontal and limbic activation in depression is limited. METHODS: We used functional magnetic resonance imaging and two emotional information processing tasks to examine frontal and limbic activation in ten patients with major depression and comorbid with preceding generalized anxiety (MDD/GAD) and ten non-depressed controls. RESULTS: Consistent with prior studies on depression, MDD/GADpatients showed hypoactivation in medial and middle frontal regions, as well as in the anterior cingulate, cingulate and insula. However, heightened anxiety in MDD/GADpatients was associated with increased activation in middle frontal regions and the insula and the effects varied with the type of emotional information presented. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight frontal and limbic hypoactivation in patients with depression and comorbid anxiety and indicate that anxiety level may modulate frontal and limbic activation depending upon the emotional context. One implication of this finding is that divergent findings reported in the imaging literature on depression could reflect modulation of activation by anxiety level in response to different types of emotional information.
Authors: Anna S Engels; Wendy Heller; Jeffrey M Spielberg; Stacie L Warren; Bradley P Sutton; Marie T Banich; Gregory A Miller Journal: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: Mohammed R Milad; Gregory J Quirk; Roger K Pitman; Scott P Orr; Bruce Fischl; Scott L Rauch Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2007-08-20 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Terrie E Moffitt; HonaLee Harrington; Avshalom Caspi; Julia Kim-Cohen; David Goldberg; Alice M Gregory; Richie Poulton Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2007-06
Authors: Marie-France Marin; Rachel G Zsido; Huijin Song; Natasha B Lasko; William D S Killgore; Scott L Rauch; Naomi M Simon; Mohammed R Milad Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Vonetta M Dotson; Sarah M Szymkowicz; Joshua W Kirton; Molly E McLaren; Mackenzie L Green; Jessica Y Rohani Journal: J Depress Anxiety Date: 2014-01-24
Authors: M Spies; C Kraus; N Geissberger; B Auer; M Klöbl; M Tik; I-L Stürkat; A Hahn; M Woletz; D M Pfabigan; S Kasper; C Lamm; C Windischberger; R Lanzenberger Journal: Transl Psychiatry Date: 2017-01-24 Impact factor: 6.222