Five patellar proximodistal positioning indices compared in clinically normal Greenland sled dogs.

Patellar luxation in large-breed dogs is associated with abnormal proximodistal patellar positioning. Using a clinically normal population of Greenland sled dogs, measurement reliability and the effect of limb position were compared for five patellar proximodistal positioning indices based on the Insall-Salvati (IS), modified Insall-Salvati (mIS), de Carvalho (dC), patellotrochlear (PT) and Blackburne-Peel (BP) indices. Indices were measured at one knee angle in 44 dogs and two knee angles in 10 dogs. Index susceptibility to error was modelled for different errors in knee angle estimation. Two reported techniques for determining knee angle were compared in a fox hind limb model. Indices dC and PT were significantly affected by knee angle (P<0.001). Error susceptibility was the lowest for IS and the greatest for PT. Intra- and inter-observer agreements were moderate to substantial for all indices. Measurement precision was good for all indices except BP. Patellar ligament laxity significantly affected IS, mIS, dC and BP (P<0.05). Knee angle measurements were technique dependent, with a bias of 9° to 13° and limits of agreement of ±5°. All five indices were reliable, but precision varied. For pre- and post-operative comparison, dC showed less error susceptibility than PT and better precision than BP. An ideal index for clinical use remains to be defined; the best option is dC, although with limitations. The method of knee angle measurement must be defined prior to index measurement and comparison of index values. Index values may vary with species and/or body size.