Literature DB >> 22321356

The influence of proximal ulnar morphology on elbow range of motion.

Dominique M Rouleau1, Fanny Canet, Julien Chapleau, Yvan Petit, Emilie Sandman, Kenneth J Faber, George S Athwal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physiologic dorsal apex angulation of the proximal ulna is present in 96% of the population. We hypothesize that a correlation exists between the physiologic dorsal ulnar angulation and elbow range of motion (ROM).
METHODS: Fifty healthy adults underwent bilateral lateral elbow radiographs in neutral forearm rotation in the following positions: terminal flexion (TF), 90° of flexion, and terminal extension (TE). The proximal ulna dorsal angulation (PUDA), TF, and TE were measured on the digital lateral radiographs by 2 independent observers. ROM was calculated as the difference between TF and TE measurements. Subjects were divided into 2 groups: those with PUDA measurements less than the median and those with PUDA measurements equal to or greater than the median. The relationship between the PUDA and TE, TF, and ROM was evaluated by use of Pearson correlation coefficients.
RESULTS: The mean age of the cohort was 31 ± 9 years, and there were 30 women among the 50 volunteers. The sample of 100 elbow radiographs had a mean TF of 150.8° ± 4.5°, a mean TE (ie, flexion contracture) of 11.5° ± 7.3°, and a mean ROM of 139.3° ± 8.4°. The mean PUDA was 5.2° ± 2.8°. Elbows with a greater PUDA had significantly less TE (r = 0.381, P ≤ .001) and ROM (r = -0.351, P ≤ .001). The group of elbows with a lesser PUDA had better TE (9.4° vs 13.6°, P = .004) and ROM (142.0° vs 136.7°, P = .001) than elbows with a greater PUDA.
CONCLUSION: The increasing magnitude of the PUDA is associated with decreased maximal elbow extension and global elbow ROM.
Copyright © 2012 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22321356     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  5 in total

1.  Morphometric analysis of the proximal ulna using three-dimensional computed tomography and computer-aided design: varus, dorsal, and torsion angulation.

Authors:  Woon Jae Yong; Jun Tan; Arnold Adikrishna; Hyun Joo Lee; Jin Woo Jung; Dong-Woo Cho; In-Ho Jeon
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Proximal ulna morphometry: which are the "true" anatomical preshaped olecranon plates?

Authors:  Trifon Totlis; Nikolaos Anastasopoulos; Stylianos Apostolidis; George Paraskevas; Ioannis Terzidis; Konstantinos Natsis
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Redefining the proximal ulna anatomy.

Authors:  Ceren Günenç Beşer; Deniz Demiryürek; Hakan Özsoy; Burcu Erçakmak; Mutlu Hayran; Onur Kızılay; Arzu Özsoy
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Modified cerclage wiring in comminuted transolecranon fracture-dislocations of the elbow.

Authors:  Praveen Sodavarapu; Deepak Kumar; Shahnawaz Khan; Karmesh Kumar; Aman Hooda; Aditya Vardhan Guduru
Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma       Date:  2021-12-15

Review 5.  Clinical anatomy and biomechanics of the elbow.

Authors:  Kuen Chin; Shakir Hussain; George Mazis; Anand Arya
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-06-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.