Literature DB >> 22321298

Reconstruction of quasi-radial dipolar activity using three-component magnetic field measurements.

J Haueisen1, K Fleissig, D Strohmeier, T Elsarnagawy, R Huonker, M Liehr, O W Witte.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: While standard magnetoencephalographic systems record only one component of the biomagnetic field, novel vector-biomagnetometers enable measurement of all three components of the field at each sensing point. Because information content in standard one-component magnetoencephalography (MEG) is often not adequate to reconstruct quasi-radial dipolar activity, we tested the hypothesis that quasi-radial activity can be estimated using three-component MEG.
METHODS: We stimulated the right median nerve in 11 healthy volunteers and recorded the somatosensory evoked fields over the contralateral hemisphere using a novel vector-biomagnetometer system comprised of SQUID-based magnetometer triplets. Source reconstruction for the early cortical components N20m and P25m was subsequently performed.
RESULTS: Both tangential and quasi-radial dipolar activity could be reconstructed in 10 of the 11 participants. Dipole locations were found in the vicinity of the central sulcus, and dipole orientations were predominantly tangential for N20m and quasi-radial for P25m. The mean location difference between the tangential and quasi-radial dipoles was 11.9 mm and the mean orientation difference was 97.5°.
CONCLUSIONS: Quasi-radial dipolar activity can be reconstructed from three-component magnetoencephalographic measurements. SIGNIFICANCE: Three-component MEG provides higher information content than does standard MEG.
Copyright © 2012 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22321298     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.12.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  4 in total

1.  Performance Analysis of Optically Pumped 4He Magnetometers vs. Conventional SQUIDs: From Adult to Infant Head Models.

Authors:  Saeed Zahran; Mahdi Mahmoudzadeh; Fabrice Wallois; Nacim Betrouni; Philippe Derambure; Matthieu Le Prado; Agustin Palacios-Laloy; Etienne Labyt
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Triaxial detection of the neuromagnetic field using optically-pumped magnetometry: feasibility and application in children.

Authors:  Elena Boto; Vishal Shah; Ryan M Hill; Natalie Rhodes; James Osborne; Cody Doyle; Niall Holmes; Molly Rea; James Leggett; Richard Bowtell; Matthew J Brookes
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 7.400

3.  Skull Defects in Finite Element Head Models for Source Reconstruction from Magnetoencephalography Signals.

Authors:  Stephan Lau; Daniel Güllmar; Lars Flemming; David B Grayden; Mark J Cook; Carsten H Wolters; Jens Haueisen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Transforming and comparing data between standard SQUID and OPM-MEG systems.

Authors:  Urban Marhl; Anna Jodko-Władzińska; Rüdiger Brühl; Tilmann Sander; Vojko Jazbinšek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.