Literature DB >> 22320372

A national model for developing, implementing, and evaluating evidence-based guidelines for prehospital care.

Eddy S Lang1, Daniel W Spaite, Zoe J Oliver, Catherine S Gotschall, Robert A Swor, Drew E Dawson, Richard C Hunt.   

Abstract

In 2007, the Institute of Medicine's (IOM's) Committee on the Future of Emergency Care recommended that a multidisciplinary panel establish a model for developing evidence-based protocols for the treatment of emergency medical systems (EMS) patients. In response, the National EMS Advisory Council (NEMSAC) and the Federal Interagency Committee on EMS (FICEMS) convened a panel of multidisciplinary experts to review current strategies for developing evidence-based guidelines (EBGs) and to propose a model for developing such guidelines for the prehospital milieu. This paper describes the eight-step model endorsed by FICEMS, NEMSAC, and a panel of EMS and evidence-based medicine experts. According to the model, prehospital EBG development would begin with the input of evidence from various external sources. Potential EBG topics would be suggested following a preliminary evidentiary review; those topics with sufficient extant foundational evidence would be selected for development. Next, the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology would be used to determine a quality-of-evidence rating and a strength of recommendation related to the patient care guidelines. More specific, contextualized patient care protocols would then be generated and disseminated to the EMS community. After educating EMS professionals using targeted teaching materials, the protocols would be implemented in local EMS systems. Finally, effectiveness and uptake would be measured with integrated quality improvement and outcomes monitoring systems. The constituencies and experts involved in the model development process concluded that the use of such transparent, objective, and scientifically rigorous guidelines could significantly increase the quality of EMS care in the future.
© 2012 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22320372     DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01281.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  4 in total

1.  Early administration of steroids in the ambulance setting: Protocol for a type I hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial with a stepped wedge design.

Authors:  Jennifer N Fishe; Phyllis Hendry; Jennifer Brailsford; Ramzi G Salloum; Bruce Vogel; Erik Finlay; Sam Palmer; Susmita Datta; Leslie Hendeles; Kathryn Blake
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  Exclusion of context knowledge in the development of prehospital guidelines: results produced by realistic evaluation.

Authors:  Magnus Andersson Hagiwara; Bjorn-Ove Suserud; Anders Jonsson; Maria Henricson
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  How reliable is perioperative anticoagulant management? Determining guideline compliance and practice variation by a retrospective patient record review.

Authors:  Marco J Moesker; Janke F de Groot; Nikki L Damen; Menno V Huisman; Martine C de Bruijne; Cordula Wagner
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  A model to explain the challenges of emergency medical technicians' decision making process in emergency situations: a grounded theory.

Authors:  Meysam Safi-Keykaleh; Davoud Khorasani-Zavareh; Zohreh Ghomian; Katarina Bohm
Journal:  J Inj Violence Res       Date:  2022-01-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.