Literature DB >> 22320360

Restoration of critical-size defects in the rabbit mandible using porous nanohydroxyapatite-polyamide scaffolds.

Jun Guo1, Zhaosong Meng, Gang Chen, Dan Xie, Yali Chen, Hang Wang, Wei Tang, Lei Liu, Wei Jing, Jie Long, Weihua Guo, Weidong Tian.   

Abstract

Composite nanohydroxyapatite/polyamide (n-HA/PA) biomaterials have been indicated for bone defect reconstruction, where PA is added to enhance the toughness of n-HA. However, a comprehensive understanding of the biological performance of this implant material remains to be determined. In this study, the biological activity of n-HA/PA biomaterials was characterized in vitro by assessing the growth of bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs), and in an in vivo rabbit model. To evaluate the n-HA/PA performance under different osteogenic conditions in vivo, implants were inserted to critical-size bone defects in the angle and body of the rabbit mandible. To determine the necessity of ectogenic BMSC-n-HA/PA hybrids at different implantation sites, both raw n-HA/PA materials and BMSC-seeded n-HA/PA hybrids were implanted. Bone formation was detected by radiology and histological studies. The results showed that n-HA/PA composites had great bioactivity, demonstrating significant BMSC proliferation, active alkaline phosphatase secretion, and stimulating the expression of osteogenic proteins (bone morphogenetic protein 2 [BMP2], osteoprotegerin [OPG], osteopontin [OPN], collagen type I [Col I], and osteocalcin [OCN]), in comparison to the control (polyethylene). At marrow-rich implantation sites (mandibular body), the amount of new bone formation was significant, but was not enhanced by the presence of BMSCs in the BMSC-n-HA/PA hybrids. However, the BMSC-n-HA/PA hybrids were essential for promoting bone formation in marrow-poor sites (mandibular angle). In conclusion, n-HA/PA biomaterials, which offer the advantage of enhanced mechanical performance over n-HA, exhibit significant bioactivity, including the capacity for bone regeneration at marrow-poor sites when implanted in combination with BMSCs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22320360     DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2011.0503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A        ISSN: 1937-3341            Impact factor:   3.845


  13 in total

Review 1.  Enhancing regenerative approaches with nanoparticles.

Authors:  Sabine van Rijt; Pamela Habibovic
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  A composite critical-size rabbit mandibular defect for evaluation of craniofacial tissue regeneration.

Authors:  Sarita R Shah; Simon Young; Julia L Goldman; John A Jansen; Mark E Wong; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 3.  Use of nanoparticles in skeletal tissue regeneration and engineering.

Authors:  Miriam Filippi; Gordian Born; Delphine Felder-Flesch; Arnaud Scherberich
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 4.  Nanotechnology in bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Graham G Walmsley; Adrian McArdle; Ruth Tevlin; Arash Momeni; David Atashroo; Michael S Hu; Abdullah H Feroze; Victor W Wong; Peter H Lorenz; Michael T Longaker; Derrick C Wan
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 5.307

5.  Angiogenesis and bone regeneration of porous nano-hydroxyapatite/coralline blocks coated with rhVEGF165 in critical-size alveolar bone defects in vivo.

Authors:  Bing Du; Weizhen Liu; Yue Deng; Shaobing Li; Xiangning Liu; Yan Gao; Lei Zhou
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-03-31

6.  Dual delivery of BMP-2 and bFGF from a new nano-composite scaffold, loaded with vascular stents for large-size mandibular defect regeneration.

Authors:  Jiansheng Su; Hongzhen Xu; Jun Sun; Xue Gong; Hang Zhao
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  Nanotechnology in dentistry: prevention, diagnosis, and therapy.

Authors:  Ensanya Ali Abou Neel; Laurent Bozec; Roman A Perez; Hae-Won Kim; Jonathan C Knowles
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-10-08

8.  Clinical outcomes of two types of cages used in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases: n-HA/PA66 cages versus PEEK cages.

Authors:  Qian-xing Deng; Yun-sheng Ou; Yong Zhu; Zeng-hui Zhao; Bo Liu; Qiu Huang; Xing Du; Dian-ming Jiang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 9.  Strategies and First Advances in the Development of Prevascularized Bone Implants.

Authors:  Christoph Rücker; Holger Kirch; Oliver Pullig; Heike Walles
Journal:  Curr Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2016-08-15

10.  Bone repair access of BoneCeramic™ in 5-mm defects: study on rat calvaria.

Authors:  André Luis da Silva Fabris; Leonardo Perez Faverani; Pedro Henrique Silva Gomes-Ferreira; Tárik Ocon Braga Polo; Joel Ferreira Santiago-Júnior; Roberta Okamoto
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.