Literature DB >> 2231996

Visual impairment in a rural Appalachian community. Prevalence and causes.

M R Dana1, J M Tielsch, C Enger, E Joyce, J M Santoli, H R Taylor.   

Abstract

A population-based survey of 1136 subjects aged 40 years and older was conducted in a rural valley of Kentucky to determine the nature and extent of visual disability in an underserved area of rural America. Data on corrected visual acuity and ocular history, along with demographic, socioeconomic, and health care utilization parameters, were gathered. Those subjects with an acuity below 20/60 in either eye underwent a comprehensive ophthalmologic examination. The prevalence of binocular blindness (acuity worse than 20/400 in the better eye) was 0.44% and of monocular blindness (acuity worse than 20/400 in one eye) was 3.3%, approximately twice the national rates. The chief cause of bilateral visual impairment was macular degeneration among men and cataract among women. Cataract, trauma, and amblyopia were the major causes of monocular visual impairment in both sexes. Risk factor analysis revealed younger age, higher education, active employment, access to a health care facility, and comprehensive health insurance coverage to be inversely associated with visual impairment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2231996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  15 in total

1.  Prevalence of self-rated visual impairment among adults with diabetes.

Authors:  J B Saaddine; K M Narayan; M M Engelgau; R E Aubert; R Klein; G L Beckles
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Socioeconomic status and blindness.

Authors:  R Dandona; L Dandona
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Mood and anxiety disorders among rural, urban, and metropolitan residents in the United States.

Authors:  Chamberlain C Diala; Carles Muntaner
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2003-06

4.  The therapy of amblyopia: an analysis comparing the results of amblyopia therapy utilizing two pooled data sets.

Authors:  J T Flynn; G Woodruff; J R Thompson; F Hiscox; W Feuer; J Schiffman; A Corona; L K Smith
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1999

5.  Glaucoma Screening in Nepal: Cup-to-Disc Estimate With Standard Mydriatic Fundus Camera Compared to Portable Nonmydriatic Camera.

Authors:  Sarah E Miller; Suman Thapa; Alan L Robin; Leslie M Niziol; Pradeep Y Ramulu; Maria A Woodward; Indira Paudyal; Ian Pitha; Tyson N Kim; Paula Anne Newman-Casey
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Visual impairment and socioeconomic factors.

Authors:  P M Livingston; C A McCarty; H R Taylor
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  The therapy of amblyopia: an analysis of the results of amblyopia therapy utilizing the pooled data of published studies.

Authors:  J T Flynn; J Schiffman; W Feuer; A Corona
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1998

8.  The prevalence of visual impairment and blindness in underserved rural areas: a crucial issue for future.

Authors:  H Hashemi; A Yekta; E Jafarzadehpur; A Doostdar; H Ostadimoghaddam; M Khabazkhoob
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Digital reader vs print media: the role of digital technology in reading accuracy in age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  K Gill; A Mao; A M Powell; T Sheidow
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  Prevalence and causes of blindness and low vision in the Casteldaccia Eye Study.

Authors:  F Ponte; G Giuffrè; R Giammanco
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.