| Literature DB >> 22319512 |
Shamsun Nahar1, Marzia Sultana, M Niamul Naser, Gopinath B Nair, Haruo Watanabe, Makoto Ohnishi, Shouji Yamamoto, Hubert Endtz, Alejandro Cravioto, R Bradley Sack, Nur A Hasan, Abdus Sadique, Anwar Huq, Rita R Colwell, Munirul Alam.
Abstract
Seasonal plankton blooms correlate with occurrence of cholera in Bangladesh, although the mechanism of how dormant Vibrio cholerae, enduring interepidemic period in biofilms and plankton, initiates seasonal cholera is not fully understood. In this study, laboratory microcosms prepared with estuarine Mathbaria water (MW) samples supported active growth of toxigenic V. cholerae O1 up to 7 weeks as opposed to 6 months when microcosms were supplemented with dehydrated shrimp chitin chips (CC) as the single source of nutrient. Bacterial counting and detection of wbe and ctxA genes were done employing culture, direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) assay, and multiplex-polymerase chain reaction methods. In MW microcosm, the aqueous phase became clear as the non-culturable cells settled, whereas the aqueous phase of the MW-CC microcosm became turbid from bacterial growth stimulated by chitin. Bacterial chitin degradation and biofilm formation proceeded from an initial steady state to a gradually declining bacterial culturable count. V. cholerae within the microenvironments of chitin and chitin-associated biofilms remained metabolically active even in a high acidic environment without losing either viability or virulence. It is concluded that the abundance of chitin that occurs during blooms plays an important role in the aquatic life cycle of V. cholerae and, ultimately, in the seasonal transmission of cholera.Entities:
Keywords: biofilm; chitin; cholera; ecology; shrimp; transmission
Year: 2012 PMID: 22319512 PMCID: PMC3250921 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00260
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Comparison of .
| Day | Type of microcosm | Plate count (cfu/ml) | Agglutinate | DFA | Multiplex-PCR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCBS | LBA | Cells/ml | O1 | ||||
| 1 | 2.0 × 106 | 3.8 × 107 | + | 3.8 × 108 | + | + | |
| 2.0 × 106 | 3.8 × 107 | + | 3.8 × 108 | + | + | ||
| 7 | 2.1 × 103 | 1.1 × 104 | + | + | + | + | |
| 2.8 × 103 | 3.8 × 104 | + | 1.8 × 108 | + | + | ||
| 14 | 1.4 × 103 | 1.9 × 104 | + | BF | + | + | |
| 1.9 × 103 | 1.7 × 104 | + | 1.8 × 108 | + | + | ||
| 21 | 2.0 × 103 | 2.4 × 104 | + | BF | + | + | |
| 1.6 × 103 | 2.8 × 104 | + | BF | + | + | ||
| 28 | 1.9 × 103 | 1.3 × 104 | + | BF | + | + | |
| 1.1 × 103 | 4.8 × 104 | + | BF | + | + | ||
| 35 | 1.6 × 102 | 1.1 × 103 | + | BF | + | + | |
| 1.7 × 101 | 2.4 × 102 | + | BF | + | + | ||
| 42 | 1.6 × 101 | 2.4 × 103 | + | BF | + | + | |
| <10 | 1.0 × 102 | + | BF | + | + | ||
| 49 | 7.7 × 101 | 2.4 × 102 | + | BF | + | + | |
| <10 | 6.8 × 101 | + | BF | + | + | ||
| 56 | 6.7 × 101 | 1.4 × 102 | + | BF | + | + | |
| <10 | <10 | NG | BF | ND | ND | ||
| 63 | 6.5 × 101 | 1.2 × 102 | + | BFd | + | + | |
| <10 | <10 | NG | BF | ND | ND | ||
| 70 | 6.4 × 101 | 1.0 × 102 | + | BF | + | + | |
| <10 | <10 | NG | BF | ND | ND | ||
| 76 | 4.0 × 101 | 5.0 × 101 | + | BF | + | + | |
| ND | ND | NG | ND | ND | ND | ||
| 92 | <10 | 1.1 × 101 | + | ND | + | + | |
| ND | ND | NG | ND | ND | ND | ||
| 99 | <10 | 2.5 × 101 | + | ND | + | + | |
| ND | ND | NG | ND | ND | ND | ||
| 113 | ND | 2.1 × 101 | + | ND | + | + | |
| ND | ND | NG | ND | ND | ND | ||
| 132 | ND | 2.0 × 101 | + | ND | + | + | |
| ND | ND | NG | ND | ND | ND | ||
| 146 | ND | 2.1 × 101 | + | ND | + | + | |
| ND | ND | NG | ND | ND | ND | ||
| 160 | ND | 2.1 × 101 | + | ND | + | + | |
| ND | ND | NG | ND | ND | ND | ||
| 174 | ND | 1.0 × 101 | + | ND | + | + | |
| ND | ND | NG | ND | ND | ND | ||
| 189 | ND | <10 | NG | BF | + | + | |
| ND | ND | NG | ND | ND | ND | ||
.
.
.
.
.
Mathbaria water, Mathbaria pond water microcosm, inoculated with .
Figure 1External observation of the utilization of shrimp chitin in the MW–CC microcosm at room temperature (A) intact chitin chips at day 1 and (B) degraded chitin chips at day 189.
Figure 2Micrographs showing attachment and utilization of shrimp chitin by . Samples were stained with 0.4% crystal violet. The stained samples were visualized using a light microscope (Carl Zeiss model Axioskop 40). Microscope images were captured digitally (AxioCam MRc) and processed using Adobe Photoshop (version 5). (A) Hexagonal structure of intact chitin chip at day 1 (B) attachment and colonization of the chitin chip by V. cholerae O1 cells at day 7; (C) aggregates of biofilm of V. cholerae O1 cells on decaying chitin chips at day 28; (D) thick biofilm and chitin residues colonized by V. cholerae O1 cells showing utilization of chitin (higher magnification in inset) at day 70. (Scale bars in red indicate 10 μm).
Figure 3Epifluorescent micrographs of attachment and utilization of shrimp chitin by . Fluorescent monoclonal antibody (DFA) specific for V. cholerae O1 obtained from New Horizon Diagnostics, were used and the stained cells were visualized using an epifluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss model Axioskop 40). Microscopic images were captured digitally (AxioCam MRc) and processed using Adobe Photoshop (version 5). (A) Attachment and colonization of V. cholerae O1 on a chitin chip at day 7; (B) clusters of biofilm bound cells on a decaying chitin chip at day 28; (C) thick biofilm and small residues of chitin chips colonized by V. cholerae O1 (utilization of chitin) at day 70; (D) typical cells, dividing cells, together with mostly coccoid cells of V. cholerae O1 in the homogenate of HCl-treated chitin residue at day 189. (Scale bars in red indicate 10 μm).