Literature DB >> 22319417

New technology review process: the laparoscopic adjustable gastric band.

Sandra Arthurs, Yerado Abrahamian, Elizabeth L Loughren, Jo Carol Hiatt, Robin Cisneros, Jed Weissberg.   

Abstract

The Interregional New Technologies Committee (INTC) is one evaluation route for new medical technologies or technologies with expanded indications within Kaiser Permanente (KP). The primary focus of the INTC is to consider all available published evidence on a particular technology, surgical technique, or implantable device for a specific clinical indication and provide a recommendation on the sufficiency of the evidence for determining net medical benefit to Permanente Medical Group leaders and Kaiser Foundation Health Plan management throughout KP Regions. This iterative process provides an objective, evidence-based assessment to inform decision making by physicians and support the most appropriate care for KP members. This overview illustrates the INTC process and how it supports clinical decision making using implantation of laparoscopic adjustable gastric bands (LAGBs) as an example. In February 2011, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved lowering the acceptable body mass index for the Lap-Band from 35 to 30 kg/m(2) for patients with at least one comorbid condition. It is difficult to find published studies on medical technologies that have been recently approved by the FDA. The manufacturer often submits clinical data to the FDA, but details are frequently not publicly available at the time of approval. The LAGB example demonstrates the complex issues addressed by the INTC, particularly when there is some evidence of short-term improvement in outcomes with a medical device but little if any confirmation of long-term safety or effectiveness.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22319417      PMCID: PMC3267562          DOI: 10.7812/tpp/11-095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perm J        ISSN: 1552-5767


  9 in total

1.  Medical device adverse event reports and the Food and Drug Administration.

Authors:  Lazar J Greenfield
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  Early postoperative outcomes of metabolic surgery to treat diabetes from sites participating in the ASMBS bariatric surgery center of excellence program as reported in the Bariatric Outcomes Longitudinal Database.

Authors:  Eric J Demaria; Deborah A Winegar; Virginia W Pate; Neil E Hutcher; Jaime Ponce; Walter J Pories
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Metabolic surgery for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in patients with BMI <35 kg/m2: an integrative review of early studies.

Authors:  M Fried; G Ribaric; J N Buchwald; S Svacina; K Dolezalova; N Scopinaro
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Obesity surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  S Sauerland; L Angrisani; M Belachew; J M Chevallier; F Favretti; N Finer; A Fingerhut; M Garcia Caballero; J A Guisado Macias; R Mittermair; M Morino; S Msika; F Rubino; R Tacchino; R Weiner; E A M Neugebauer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Re-emergence of diabetes after gastric bypass in patients with mid- to long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Mary DiGiorgi; Daniel J Rosen; Jenny J Choi; Luca Milone; Beth Schrope; Lorraine Olivero-Rivera; Nancy Restuccia; Sara Yuen; McKenzie Fisk; William B Inabnet; Marc Bessler
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 4.734

Review 6.  Bariatric surgery: risks and rewards.

Authors:  Walter J Pories
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 7.  Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Henry Buchwald; Yoav Avidor; Eugene Braunwald; Michael D Jensen; Walter Pories; Kyle Fahrbach; Karen Schoelles
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Impact of patient follow-up on weight loss after bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Roy Shen; Giovanni Dugay; Kavitha Rajaram; Izumi Cabrera; Niccole Siegel; Christine J Ren
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 9.  Bariatric surgery for the treatment of morbid obesity: a meta-analysis of weight loss outcomes for laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and laparoscopic gastric bypass.

Authors:  Jane Garb; Garry Welch; Sofija Zagarins; Jay Kuhn; John Romanelli
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 4.129

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Morbid obesity-the new pandemic: medical and surgical management, and implications for the practicing gastroenterologist.

Authors:  John P Cello; Stanley J Rogers
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 4.488

2.  Reoperation and Medicare Expenditures After Laparoscopic Gastric Band Surgery.

Authors:  Andrew M Ibrahim; Jyothi R Thumma; Justin B Dimick
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 14.766

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.