| Literature DB >> 22319327 |
Rémy Claverie1, Marc D Fontana, Ivana Duričković, Patrice Bourson, Mario Marchetti, Jean-Marie Chassot.
Abstract
We propose a new optical sensor to characterize the solid-liquid phase transition in salted solutions. The probe mainly consists of a Raman spectrometer that extracts the vibrational properties from the light scattered by the salty medium. The spectrum of the O-H stretching band was shown to be strongly affected by the introduction of NaCl and the temperature change as well. A parameter SD defined as the ratio of the integrated intensities of two parts of this band allows to study the temperature and concentration dependences of the phase transition. Then, an easy and efficient signal processing and the exploitation of a modified Boltzmann equation give information on the phase transition. Validations were done on solutions with varying concentration of NaCl.Entities:
Keywords: Raman sensor; phase transition; salted solution
Year: 2010 PMID: 22319327 PMCID: PMC3274248 DOI: 10.3390/s100403815
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1.Typical Raman spectra of water at liquid and solid states.
Figure 2.Concentration effect of the O – H stretching region on a Raman spectrum at 20 °C.
Figure 3.Points: data of pure water – Line: Fit with the modified Boltzmann equation (Equation 2).
Figure 4.Materials of the sensor: the computer drives the spectrometer and proceed acquisitions and signal processing.
Figure 5.Points: concentration index S according to the temperature for several values of concentration. Lines: fit with Equation 2.
Figure 6.Linear relationship between the parameters A2 and A3 and the concentration.
Figure 7.Linear relationship between the parameters T and ΔT with the concentration.
Figure 8.Linear relationship between the parameter A1 and the concentration.
Fitted parameters of curves of figure 5.
| Concentration (g/L) | Parameters
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Δ | |||||
| 0 | 0.430 ± 0.002 | 1.19 ± 0.01 | 7.4 ± 1.5 | 0.01 ± 0.002 | 0.39 ± 0.02 |
| 40 | 0.580 ± 0.003 | 1.300 ± 0.008 | 11.4 ± 1.3 | −5.77 ± 0.06 | 0.80 ± 0.05 |
| 80 | 0.740 ± 0.004 | 1.530 ± 0.007 | 8.8 ± 0.2 | −8.23 ± 0.12 | 1.79 ± 0.09 |
| 120 | 0.920 ± 0.006 | 1.690 ± 0.004 | 10.0 ± 0.7 | −9.93 ± 0.10 | 1.63 ± 0.09 |
| 160 | 1.05 ± 0.02 | 1.870 ± 0.002 | 14.6 ± 0.4 | −22.26 ± 0.27 | 2.48 ± 0.2 |
| 200 | 1.64 ± 0.08 | 2.080 ± 0.004 | 12.8 ± 0.4 | −25.79 ± 0.95 | 0.56 ± 0.05 |
Figure 9.Experimental validation of the method: the curves are plots from Equation 9.