Literature DB >> 22319226

A Hepatocellular Adenoma in a Diet-induced Obese Mouse.

Kouji Kawai, Tetsuya Sakairi, Masaharu Tanaka, Junko Shinozuka, Mika Ide, Hiroko Sato, Toshihisa Fujiwara, Fumiko Sano, Eisuke Kume.   

Abstract

A hepatic nodule was noted in a C57BL/6J mouse with diet-induced obesity at 53 weeks of age. Macroscopically, a protruding yellowish white nodule was observed on the visceral surface of the left lateral lobe. Light microscopy demonstrated clear demarcation from the compressed adjacent parenchyma, with loss of the distinct lobular pattern. The proliferating cells of the lesion varied in shape and showed cellular atypia and prominent nucleoli along with vacuoles of various sizes. Some of the cells contained various-sized eosinophilic inclusion bodies in their cytoplasm, and electron microscopy revealed the presence of lipid droplets in the rough endoplasmic reticulum. Eosinophilic inclusions were observed as electron dense granular material in the rough endoplasmic reticulum, with one or a few low density central cores. A diagnosis of hepatocellular adenoma was made based on these findings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hepatocellular adenoma; diet-induced obese mouse; inclusion body

Year:  2010        PMID: 22319226      PMCID: PMC3234647          DOI: 10.1293/tox.23.59

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Toxicol Pathol        ISSN: 0914-9198            Impact factor:   1.628


Introduction

Diet-induced obese (DIO) mice are widely used for studies of human obesity and insulin resistance and for evaluating the efficacy of various kinds of anti-obesity agents. 1 Although the pathogenesis of obesity in DIO mice has been intensely studied, there are few reports on histopathological analysis of associated hepatocellular proliferative lesions. We describe here a hepatocellular adenoma in a DIO mouse in a vehicle control group of a pharmacological study in our research laboratory. Three-week-old male C57BL/6J mice were obtained from Charles River Laboratories Japan, Inc. (Yokohama, Japan) and fed a high-fat diet (59% fat by calories, 5.578 kcal/g, Oriental Yeast Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and water ad libitum. At 51 weeks of age, the animal was assigned to the vehicle-treated group and given 0.5% hydroxypropyl methylcellulose/0.1% Tween 80 orally for 2 weeks. At necropsy (53 weeks of age), a hepatic nodule was noted in the mouse. For light microscopy, the nodule and surrounding liver tissue was fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin. Sections (4 µm) were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) and Watanabe’s silver stain and examined under a light microscope. For electron microscopy, small pieces of the nodule were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde solution and 2.0% formalin, postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide and embedded in epoxy resin. Ultrathin sections were double-stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and examined under a JEM-1210 electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). Macroscopically, a protruding nodule approximately 10 mm in diameter was observed on the visceral surface of the left lateral lobe (Fig. 1). The surface of the liver was pale brown, whereas the nodule was yellowish-white. No other findings were noted in the other lobes of the liver or in the other organs grossly.
Fig. 1

Gross appearance of the hepatic nodule in the diet-induced obese mouse. The nodule was about 10 mm in diameter.

On light microscopy, the lesion was found to be well demarcated from the surrounding tissue, and compression of the adjacent parenchyma was noted (Fig. 2). Compressed adjacent hepatic cords and loss of the lobular pattern within the lesion were prominent on Watanabe silver staining (Fig. 3.). Some bile ducts were partly noted within the lesion. The lesion was characterized by proliferating hepatocytes that had weakly basophilic cytoplasm with vacuoles of various sizes. The proliferating cells did not form distinct hepatic cords and showed architectural and cellular atypia with prominent nucleoli (Fig. 4). Some appeared packed with fine vacuoles throughout the entire cytoplasm, showing a ground glass-like appearance (Fig. 4). Such vacuoles were much less prominent in the hepatocytes of the surrounding tissue. In addition, some proliferating cells contained various-sized eosinophilic inclusion bodies in their cytoplasm (Fig. 4).
Fig. 2

Periphery of the lesion. Note that the boundary is clear and that the surrounding hepatic parenchyma is compressed by the nodule. HE stain, ×100.

Fig. 3

Compressed adjacent hepatic cords and loss of the distinct lobular pattern are prominent on Watanabe silver staining (×200).

Fig. 4

High magnification. The lesion is composed of proliferating hepatocytes showing cellular atypia, some featuring cytoplasmic eosinophilic inclusions. HE stain, ×400.

On electron microscopy, various sized lipid droplets of medium electron density were observed within the rough endoplasmic reticulum. Areas with a ground glass-like appearance by light microscopy were characterized by numerous small lipid droplets also in the rough endoplasmic reticulum (Fig. 5). Eosinophilic inclusions were observed as electron dense granular material in the rough endoplasmic reticulum, with one or more medium density central cores (Fig. 6).
Fig. 5

Ultrastructural appearance of an area with a ground glass-like appearance on light microscopy. Note the numerous small lipid droplets in the rough endoplasmic reticulum. Transmission electron microscope micrograph (×2500).

Fig. 6

Ultrastructure of eosinophilic inclusions. Electron dense granular material is present in the rough endoplasmic reticulum, with one or more low density central cores. Transmission electron microscope micrograph (×2500).

A diagnosis of hepatocellular adenoma was made based on the clear boundary, the compression of the surrounding tissue, loss of the lobular architecture and the proliferation and cellular atypia. The eosinophilic cytoplasmic inclusions were also thought to support the diagnosis because such inclusions are characteristically found in murine hepatic neoplasms. 2 – 5 Also, the ultrastructure of the inclusions was the same as in previous reports. 2 – 5 The fact that they were found in the rough endoplasmic reticulum was presumably the result of abnormal transportation of proteins and lipids. 6 , 7 Interestingly, areas were noted in the lesion where the degree of atypia was relatively low and bile ducts were present. In contrast, they were absent in areas of high atypia compressing the adjacent parenchyma. These findings may indicate that the lesion consisted of areas of atypical proliferating cells, and that intact bile ducts remained between the atypical areas. The effect of the high-fat diet on the present case was mainly observed as numerous lipid droplets in the proliferating cells. Interestingly, these lipid droplets were noted in the endoplasmic reticulum, which is known to be characteristic of fatty liver. 7 Also, in a different obese control mouse, another hepatocellular adenoma was noted with similar histologic features (data not shown). While it is known that a high-fat diet increases tumor incidence and promotes growth in various organs of experimental tumor models of mice, 8 – 14 the influence on the lesions remains unclear. More such cases and further studies are needed to clarify the promotion effects of high-fat diet on tumorigenesis in DIO mice.
  12 in total

Review 1.  Rodent obesity models: an overview.

Authors:  M Tschöp; M L Heiman
Journal:  Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.949

2.  Ultrastructural cytochemistry of eosinophilic inclusions in the cells of hyperplastic nodules and hepatomas in mouse liver.

Authors:  D A Muzzillo; M Hoshino; M Matsuyama
Journal:  Acta Pathol Jpn       Date:  1991-11

3.  Focal impairment of growth in hepatocellular neoplasms of C57BL/6 mice: a possible explanation for the strain's resistance to hepatocarcinogenesis.

Authors:  S Kakizoe; S Goldfarb; T D Pugh
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1989-07-15       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Fine structure of spontaneous hepatic tumors of male C3H/fGs mice.

Authors:  Z Hruban; W H Kirsten; A Slesers
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  1966-03       Impact factor: 5.662

5.  Amplified response to phenobarbital promotion of hepatotumorigenesis in obese yellow Avy/A (C3H x VY) F-1 hybrid mice.

Authors:  G L Wolff; R L Morrissey; J J Chen
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 4.944

6.  Obesity accelerates mouse mammary tumor growth in the absence of ovarian hormones.

Authors:  Nomeli P Nunez; Susan N Perkins; Nicole C P Smith; David Berrigan; David M Berendes; Lyuba Varticovski; J Carl Barrett; Stephen D Hursting
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.900

7.  Rapid body weight gain increases the risk of UV radiation-induced skin carcinogenesis in SKH-1 hairless mice.

Authors:  Albena T Dinkova-Kostova; Jed W Fahey; Stephanie N Jenkins; Scott L Wehage; Paul Talalay
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.315

8.  Low-carbohydrate diet versus caloric restriction: effects on weight loss, hormones, and colon tumor growth in obese mice.

Authors:  Karrie E Wheatley; Elizabeth A Williams; Nicole C P Smith; Alice Dillard; Eun Young Park; Nomeli P Nunez; Stephen D Hursting; Michelle A Lane
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.900

Review 9.  Influence of caloric intake on experimental carcinogenesis: a review.

Authors:  D Kritchevsky; D M Klurfeld
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.622

10.  Effects of high-fat diet and/or body weight on mammary tumor leptin and apoptosis signaling pathways in MMTV-TGF-alpha mice.

Authors:  Soner Dogan; Xin Hu; Yan Zhang; Nita J Maihle; Joseph P Grande; Margot P Cleary
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  1 in total

1.  Hepatocellular adenoma with severe fatty change in a male Spontaneously Diabetic Torii rat.

Authors:  Eriko Taniai-Riya; Katsuhiro Miyajima; Kochi Kakimoto; Takeshi Ohta; Yuzo Yasui; Yusuke Kemmochi; Akiko Anagawa-Nakamura; Kaoru Toyoda; Akemi Takahashi; Toshiyuki Shoda
Journal:  J Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 1.628

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.