Literature DB >> 2231885

Local recurrence and survival following nerve-sparing radical cystoprostatectomy.

C B Brendler1, G D Steinberg, F F Marshall, J L Mostwin, P C Walsh.   

Abstract

From March 1982 through July 1988, 76 men underwent nerve-sparing radical cystoprostatectomy for carcinoma of the bladder at our hospital. Of the 76 patients 2 (2.6%) had positive surgical margins (dome of the bladder and left ureter) and neither had positive margins at the site of nerve-sparing modifications. Of 3 patients (3.9%) who had local recurrence none had positive surgical margins. The 5-year actuarial local recurrence rate is 7.5%. Thirteen of 76 patients (17%) died of transitional cell carcinoma and 7 (9%) died of other causes, while 53 (70%) are alive without evidence of disease with a mean followup of 38.4 months. The 5-year actuarial survival rates are 64% over-all, 68% without disease and 78% disease-specific. Of the 42 evaluable men who underwent cystoprostatectomy alone 27 (64%) are potent, compared to 2 of the 12 men (17%) who also underwent urethrectomy. We conclude that the nerve-sparing modifications do not compromise cancer control, that local recurrence and survival rates are at least comparable to those achieved with standard radical cystoprostatectomy, and that it is possible to preserve potency in most men undergoing this procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2231885     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39675-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  10 in total

Review 1.  Current problems and needs in the treatment of pT1 G3 bladder carcinoma.

Authors:  Francisco Jose Martínez Portillo; Peter Alken
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  [Tips and tricks for nerve-sparing cystectomy].

Authors:  S Madersbacher; W Hochreiter; U E Studer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  Complications associated with urinary diversion.

Authors:  Richard E Hautmann; Stefan H Hautmann; Oliver Hautmann
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  Bladder cancer.

Authors:  H Y Leung; T R Griffiths; D E Neal
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 5.  Function-preserving surgery for urologic cancer.

Authors:  Kenichi Tobisu
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Prostatic capsule- and nerve-sparing cystectomy in organ-confined bladder cancer: preliminary results.

Authors:  Gianni Martis; Gianluca D'Elia; Massimo Diana; Maurizio Ombres; Bruno Mastrangeli
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Surveillance strategies after definitive therapy of invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Ilias Cagiannos; Christopher Morash
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Local recurrence in patients after radical cystectomy and orthotopic ileal neobladder: impact on function.

Authors:  Ralph Oberneder; Stephan Staudte; Raphaela Waidelich; Nikolaus Schmeller; Alfons Hofstetter
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 9.  [Advantages of nerve-sparing pelvic surgery. Animal experiments and clinical results].

Authors:  A Stenzl; A G Anastasiadis; S Corvin; G Feil; H Strasser; M Kuczyk
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 10.  Pharmacologic and surgical therapies for sexual dysfunction in male cancer survivors.

Authors:  Ateş Kadıoğlu; Mazhar Ortaç; Gerald Brock
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2015-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.