Literature DB >> 22318560

Acute effects of distribution of rest between repetitions.

E Iglesias-Soler1, E Carballeira, T Sánchez-Otero, X Mayo, A Jiménez, M L Chapman.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare acute mechanical and metabolic effects of 2 sessions of resistance training equated by volume and total resting time but with different set configuration: sets to failure (FS) vs. distribution of rest between each repetition (NFS). 10 male judoists completed a session consisting of 3 sets to failure of parallel back squat with 4 repetitions at maximum load, and a rest of 3 min between the sets. At least 72 h later subjects developed the same volume, but total resting time was distributed among individual repetitions. Before and after sessions isometric force and mean propulsive velocity with load corresponding to maximum propulsive power were assessed. Results showed that in respect to FS, NFS showed an 18.94% (± 17.98) higher average mean propulsive velocity during session (0.42 ± 0.04 vs. 0.35 ± 0.08 m.s - 1; p=0.009), lower blood lactate concentration after session (maximum average value 1.52 ± 0.77 vs. 3.95 ± 1.82; session effect: p=0.001) and higher mean propulsive velocity with load corresponding to maximum propulsive power (mean propulsive velocity immediately after session 0.64 ± 0.09 vs. 0.59 ± 0.12 m.s - 1; session effect: p=0.019). These data show that distribution of rest in sessions equated for volume and total resting time determines differences in performance during sessions and mechanical or metabolic acute effects. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22318560     DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1299699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Med        ISSN: 0172-4622            Impact factor:   3.118


  11 in total

1.  Effect of a rest-pause vs. traditional squat on electromyography and lifting volume in trained women.

Authors:  John A Korak; Max R Paquette; Dana K Fuller; Jennifer L Caputo; John M Coons
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Acute effects of different set configurations during a strength-oriented resistance training session on barbell velocity and the force-velocity relationship in resistance-trained males and females.

Authors:  Alejandro Torrejón; Danica Janicijevic; Guy Gregory Haff; Amador García-Ramos
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Acute Effects of Cluster and Rest Redistribution Set Structures on Mechanical, Metabolic, and Perceptual Fatigue During and After Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ivan Jukic; Amador García Ramos; Eric R Helms; Michael R McGuigan; James J Tufano
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  The Effects of Set Structure Manipulation on Chronic Adaptations to Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ivan Jukic; Bas Van Hooren; Amador García Ramos; Eric R Helms; Michael R McGuigan; James J Tufano
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Resistance exercise leading to failure versus not to failure: effects on cardiovascular control.

Authors:  Jéssica Cardoso De Souza; Ramires Alsamir Tibana; Claudia Regina Cavaglieri; Denis César Leite Vieira; Nuno Manuel Frade De Sousa; Felipe Augusto Dos Santos Mendes; Vitor Tajra; Wagner Rodrigues Martins; Darlan Lopes De Farias; Sandor Balsamo; James Wilfred Navalta; Carmen Silvia Grubert Campbell; Jonato Prestes
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 2.298

6.  Set Configuration in Resistance Exercise: Muscle Fatigue and Cardiovascular Effects.

Authors:  Dan Río-Rodríguez; Eliseo Iglesias-Soler; Miguel Fernández Del Olmo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effects of Cluster Sets and Rest-Redistribution on Mechanical Responses to Back Squats in Trained Men.

Authors:  James J Tufano; Jenny A Conlon; Sophia Nimphius; Lee E Brown; Alex Petkovic; Justin Frick; G Gregory Haff
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.193

8.  Interrepetition Rest Set Lacks the V-Shape Systolic Pressure Response Advantage during Resistance Exercise.

Authors:  Xian Mayo; Eliseo Iglesias-Soler; J Derek Kingsley; Xurxo Dopico
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-01

9.  Acute effects of equated volume-load resistance training leading to muscular failure versus non-failure on neuromuscular performance.

Authors:  Fabiano S Fonseca; Bruna Daniella de V Costa; Maria Elisa C Ferreira; Santiago Paes; Dalton de Lima-Junior; Witalo Kassiano; Edilson S Cyrino; Petrus Gantois; Leonardo S Fortes
Journal:  J Exerc Sci Fit       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 3.103

10.  Repetition-to-Repetition Differences Using Cluster and Accentuated Eccentric Loading in the Back Squat.

Authors:  John P Wagle; Christopher B Taber; Kevin M Carroll; Aaron J Cunanan; Matt L Sams; Alexander Wetmore; Garett E Bingham; Brad H DeWeese; Kimitake Sato; Charles A Stuart; Michael H Stone
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.