Literature DB >> 22318397

OMNI Scale of Perceived Exertion: mixed gender and race validation for Singapore children during cycle exercise.

Govindasamy Balasekaran1, Mun Keong Loh, Visvasuresh Victor Govindaswamy, Robert J Robertson.   

Abstract

The children's OMNI Scale of Perceived Exertion (RPE) has not been validated for children of Asian origin. The purpose was to validate the RPE for Singapore children, 12-15 years. 81 children of male and female of Chinese, Malay, and Indian ethnicities participated in the study. A cross-sectional, perceptual estimation paradigm using a multistage cycle ergometer protocol was used. Oxygen consumption ([Formula: see text]; ml min(-1)), heart rate (HR; beats min(-1)), and RPE for the Overall body (RPE-O), Legs (RPE-L), and Chest (RPE-C) were determined at the end of each continuously administered 3-min power output stage (PO) starting at 25 W with 25 W increments until exhaustion. For validation, linear regression analysis for all PO revealed that RPE-O, RPE-L, and RPE-C for each of the six gender-race and combined cohort distributed as positive linear functions of both [Formula: see text] (ml min(-1), ml kg(-1) min(-1)) and HR (beats min(-1)). All regression functions were statistically significant (P < 0.01). Differences between undifferentiated (RPE-O) and differentiated (RPE-L and RPE-C) at each PO stage were examined separately for the male (up to PO 8 [200 W]) and female (up to PO 5 [125 W]) cohorts. For the males, RPE-L was greater (P < 0.05) than both RPE-C and RPE-O only at PO 8. For the females, RPE-O was greater (P < 0.05) than RPE-C only at PO 3 and 4. OMNI Scale validity was established for male and female Asian children of Chinese, Malay, and Indian origin. Male and female children did not perceive the intensity of exertional perceptions to differ between the legs and the chest. As there were no differences between the undifferentiated and differentiated perceptual responses, a dominant signal was not observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22318397     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-012-2334-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  18 in total

1.  Validation of the Adult OMNI Scale of perceived exertion for walking/running exercise.

Authors:  Alan C Utter; Robert J Robertson; J Matt Green; Richard R Suminski; Steven R McAnulty; David C Nieman
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Reliability and validity of the Borg and OMNI rating of perceived exertion scales in adolescent girls.

Authors:  Karin A Pfeiffer; James M Pivarnik; Christopher J Womack; Mathew J Reeves; Robert M Malina
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 3.  Effort perception in children.

Authors:  K L Lamb; R G Eston
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  OMNI scale perceived exertion at ventilatory breakpoint in children: response normalized.

Authors:  R J Robertson; F L Goss; N Boer; J D Gallagher; T Thompkins; K Bufalino; G Balasekaran; C Meckes; J Pintar; A Williams
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Ratings of perceived exertion at maximal exercise in children performing different graded exercise test.

Authors:  A D Mahon; M L Ray
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 1.637

Review 6.  Perceived exertion. Antecedents and applications.

Authors:  B Watt; R Grove
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Differentiated ratings of perceived exertion during physical exercise.

Authors:  K B Pandolf
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Children's OMNI Scale of Perceived Exertion: walking/running evaluation.

Authors:  Alan C Utter; Robert J Robertson; David C Nieman; Jie Kang
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Children's OMNI scale of perceived exertion: mixed gender and race validation.

Authors:  R J Robertson; F L Goss; N F Boer; J A Peoples; A J Foreman; I M Dabayebeh; N B Millich; G Balasekaran; S E Riechman; J D Gallagher; T Thompkins
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Validation of a rating scale of perceived exertion in young children.

Authors:  A Groslambert; F Hintzy; M D Hoffman; B Dugué; J D Rouillon
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.118

View more
  1 in total

1.  Age-Related Differences in OMNI-RPE Scale Validity in Youth: A Longitudinal Analysis.

Authors:  Catherine Gammon; Karin A Pfeiffer; James M Pivarnik; Rebecca W Moore; Kelly R Rice; Stewart G Trost
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 5.411

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.