Literature DB >> 22318220

Variation in water potential, hydraulic characteristics and water source use in montane Douglas-fir and lodgepole pine trees in southwestern Alberta and consequences for seasonal changes in photosynthetic capacity.

Shilo F Andrews1, Lawrence B Flanagan, Eric J Sharp, Tiebo Cai.   

Abstract

Tree species response to climate change-induced shifts in the hydrological cycle depends on many physiological traits, particularly variation in water relations characteristics. We evaluated differences in shoot water potential, vulnerability of branches to reductions in hydraulic conductivity, and water source use between Pinus contorta Dougl. ex Loud. var. latifolia Engelm. (lodgepole pine) and Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco (interior Douglas-fir), and determined the consequences for seasonal changes in photosynthetic capacity. The Douglas-fir site had soil with greater depth, finer texture and higher organic matter content than soil at the lodgepole pine site, all factors that increased the storage of soil moisture. While the measured xylem vulnerability curves were quite similar for the two species, Douglas-fir had lower average midday shoot water potentials than did lodgepole pine. This implied that lodgepole pine exhibited stronger stomatal control of transpiration than Douglas-fir, which helped to reduce the magnitude of the water potential gradient required to access water from drying soil. Stable hydrogen isotope measurements indicated that Douglas-fir increased the use of groundwater during mid-summer when precipitation inputs were low, while lodgepole pine did not. There was a greater reduction of photosynthetic carbon gain in lodgepole pine compared with Douglas-fir when the two tree species were exposed to seasonal declines in soil water content. The contrasting patterns of seasonal variation in photosynthetic capacity observed for the two species were a combined result of differences in soil characteristics at the separate sites and the inherent physiological differences between the species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22318220     DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpr136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tree Physiol        ISSN: 0829-318X            Impact factor:   4.196


  6 in total

1.  Seasonal patterns of bole water content in old growth Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco).

Authors:  Peter A Beedlow; Ronald S Waschmann; E Henry Lee; David T Tingey
Journal:  Agric For Meteorol       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 5.734

2.  Influence of water deficit on the molecular responses of Pinus contorta × Pinus banksiana mature trees to infection by the mountain pine beetle fungal associate, Grosmannia clavigera.

Authors:  Adriana Arango-Velez; Leonardo M Galindo González; Miranda J Meents; Walid El Kayal; Barry J Cooke; Jean Linsky; Inka Lusebrink; Janice E K Cooke
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 4.196

3.  A catalogue of putative unique transcripts from Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) based on 454 transcriptome sequencing of genetically diverse, drought stressed seedlings.

Authors:  Thomas Müller; Ingo Ensminger; Karl J Schmid
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Application of a Hybrid Forest Growth Model to Evaluate Climate Change Impacts on Productivity, Nutrient Cycling and Mortality in a Montane Forest Ecosystem.

Authors:  Brad Seely; Clive Welham; Kim Scoullar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Quantification of Overnight Movement of Birch (Betula pendula) Branches and Foliage with Short Interval Terrestrial Laser Scanning.

Authors:  Eetu Puttonen; Christian Briese; Gottfried Mandlburger; Martin Wieser; Martin Pfennigbauer; András Zlinszky; Norbert Pfeifer
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Prevalence and magnitude of groundwater use by vegetation: a global stable isotope meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jaivime Evaristo; Jeffrey J McDonnell
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.