Literature DB >> 22317491

Thermal comfort and personal protective equipment (PPE).

Ronaldo André Castelo dos S de Almeida1, Marcelo Motta Veiga, Francisco José de Castro Moura Duarte, Luiz Antônio Meirelles, Lilian Bechara Elabras Veiga.   

Abstract

Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) is considered the last preferred solution to an Occupational Safety Health (OSH) system. Brazilian OSH legislation assumes and requires PPE usage to neutralize the possibility of pesticide contamination. This study examines the inadequacy of the PPE used in a tomato crop, particularly from the standpoint of thermal comfort. This study made observations regarding heart rate and body temperature in a controlled environment using a treadmill (with and without PPE) of 12 volunteers; and during the process of rural labor (at rest and in normal work routine) of 2 actual rural workers. Comparing the results of the treadmill test (with and without PPE) which tried to reproduce the same level of effort and environmental conditions of the actual rural work, this study demonstrated that PPE makes thermoregulation harder and tympanic temperature reaches higher values with the same level of effort. Moreover, body temperature increases quickly: with PPE it took 15 minutes to raise 1°C in body temperature, compared to 40 minutes without PPE. The results of this study indicated that the use inadequate PPE might pose thermoregulation risk to rural workers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22317491     DOI: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0042-4979

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Work        ISSN: 1051-9815


  5 in total

1.  Health Risks of Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers (PBDEs) and Metals at Informal Electronic Waste Recycling Sites.

Authors:  Chimere May Ohajinwa; Peter M van Bodegom; Oladele Osibanjo; Qing Xie; Jingwen Chen; Martina G Vijver; Willie J G M Peijnenburg
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Association between Exposure to Extreme Temperature and Injury at the Workplace.

Authors:  Junhyeong Lee; Wanhyung Lee; Won-Jun Choi; Seong-Kyu Kang; Seunghon Ham
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Human Factor Considerations in Using Personal Protective Equipment in the COVID-19 Pandemic Context: Binational Survey Study.

Authors:  Avi Parush; Oren Wacht; Ricardo Gomes; Amit Frenkel
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  On the Improvement of Thermal Protection for Temperature-Responsive Protective Clothing Incorporated with Shape Memory Alloy.

Authors:  Jiazhen He; Yehu Lu; Lijun Wang; Nini Ma
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Efficiency of Gum Rosin-Coated Personal Protective Clothing to Protect against Chlorpyrifos Exposure in Applicators.

Authors:  Ratana Sapbamrer; Manoch Naksata; Surat Hongsibsong; Jiraporn Chittrakul; Wilawan Chaiut
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.