Literature DB >> 22317485

Low-floor bus design preferences of walking aid users during simulated boarding and alighting.

Clive D'souza1, Victor Paquet, James Lenker, Edward Steinfeld, Piyush Bareria.   

Abstract

Low-floor buses represent a significant improvement in accessible public transit for passengers with limited mobility. However, there is still a need for research on the inclusive design of transit buses to identify specific low-floor bus design conditions that are either particularly accommodating or challenging for passengers with functional and mobility impairments. These include doorway locations, seating configuration and the large front wheel-well covers that collectively impact boarding, alighting and interior movement of passengers. Findings from a laboratory study using a static full-scale simulation of a lowfloor bus to evaluate the impact of seating configuration and crowding on interior movement and accessibility for individuals with and without walking aids are presented (n=41). Simulated bus journeys that included boarding, fare payment, seating, and alighting were performed. Results from video observations and subjective assessments showed differences in boarding and alighting performance and users' perceptions of task difficulty. The need for assistive design features (e.g. handholds, stanchions), legroom and stowage space for walking aids was evident. These results demonstrate that specific design conditions in low-floor buses can significantly impact design preference among those who use walking aids. Consideration of ergonomics and inclusive design can therefore be used to improve the design of low-floor buses.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22317485     DOI: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0791-4951

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Work        ISSN: 1051-9815


  4 in total

Review 1.  How a diverse research ecosystem has generated new rehabilitation technologies: Review of NIDILRR's Rehabilitation Engineering Research Centers.

Authors:  David J Reinkensmeyer; Sarah Blackstone; Cathy Bodine; John Brabyn; David Brienza; Kevin Caves; Frank DeRuyter; Edmund Durfee; Stefania Fatone; Geoff Fernie; Steven Gard; Patricia Karg; Todd A Kuiken; Gerald F Harris; Mike Jones; Yue Li; Jordana Maisel; Michael McCue; Michelle A Meade; Helena Mitchell; Tracy L Mitzner; James L Patton; Philip S Requejo; James H Rimmer; Wendy A Rogers; W Zev Rymer; Jon A Sanford; Lawrence Schneider; Levin Sliker; Stephen Sprigle; Aaron Steinfeld; Edward Steinfeld; Gregg Vanderheiden; Carolee Winstein; Li-Qun Zhang; Thomas Corfman
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 4.262

2.  Self-reported difficulty and preferences of wheeled mobility device users for simulated low-floor bus boarding, interior circulation and disembarking.

Authors:  Clive D'Souza; Victor L Paquet; James A Lenker; Edward Steinfeld
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2017-11-13

3.  Accessible Design of Low-Speed Automated Shuttles: A Brief Review of Lessons Learned from Public Transit.

Authors:  Kamolnat Tabattanon; Nicholas Sandhu; Clive D'Souza
Journal:  Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet       Date:  2019

4.  Wheeled Mobility Use on Accessible Fixed-Route Transit: A Field Study in Environmental Docility.

Authors:  Sol Lim; Clive D'Souza
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.