Literature DB >> 22317333

New tools in Germany: development and appliance of the first two KIM ("lifting, holding and carrying" and "pulling and pushing") and practical use of these methods.

Ulf Steinberg1.   

Abstract

The Key Indicator Methods (KIM) assess the risk of manual handling of loads on a screening level. Their purpose is the recognition and removal of job design deficits. The risk assessment is carried out in two stages. The first stage is the ordinal scaled description of workload items. The second stage is the evaluation of the degree of probability of physical overload. The intended user population are both practitioners in enterprises such as safety engineers, industrial engineers, and inspectors. The first two KIM were developed and tested from 1996 to 2001 in connection with the implementation of the EU directives into German national legislation. They consist of two independent, but formally adaptable methods for lifting, holding, and carrying and for pulling, and pushing. The KIM were drafted in the German Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA) in close collaboration with the German Labour Inspectors. Numerous companies, scientists, statutory accident insurances, institutions, employer associations, and trade unions were involved. Since their first publication in 2000 and 2001, these methods are widely accepted among possible users with a corresponding broad application in Germany. They are recommended by the EU Labour Inspector Conference for application. In 2007 a third KIM for manual handling operating tasks KIM MHO were developed, tested, and validated in the last four years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22317333     DOI: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0698-3990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Work        ISSN: 1051-9815


  2 in total

1.  Risk assessment of manual handling operations at work with the key indicator method (KIM-MHO) - determination of criterion validity regarding the prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms and clinical conditions within a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Andre Klussmann; Falk Liebers; Hansjürgen Gebhardt; Monika A Rieger; Ute Latza; Ulf Steinberg
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  Factors influencing ergonomists' use of observation-based risk-assessment tools.

Authors:  Kristina Eliasson; Carl Mikael Lind; Teresia Nyman
Journal:  Work       Date:  2019
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.