Literature DB >> 22317272

Ratings checklist for warnings: a prototype tool to aid experts in the adequacy evaluation of proposed or existing warnings.

David R Lenorovitz1, S David Leonard, Edward W Karnes.   

Abstract

In the field of forensic human factors, experts are often called upon to assess and evaluate the adequacy of new or existing products' warnings or warnings systems. The usual goal of this evaluation is to arrive at a simple binary decision regarding the warning in question (i.e., does it "pass/fail", or is it "adequate/inadequate"). However, such a warning assessment process may in fact be quite complex and multidimensional in its execution. The existing warnings research literature has identified a fairly large number of warnings features or factors likely to have an impact on a given warning's effectiveness or adequacy. The tool addressed in this article is intended for use by a warnings expert (as opposed to one less knowledgeable and informed about complex warnings issues), and can serve as a reminder checklist to help ensure that the expert has taken into consideration the most relevant features or factors during such a warnings adequacy assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22317272     DOI: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0114-3616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Work        ISSN: 1051-9815


  1 in total

1.  The new normal of web camera theft on campus during COVID-19 and the impact of anti-theft signage.

Authors:  William A Chernoff
Journal:  Crime Sci       Date:  2021-10-20
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.