Literature DB >> 2231713

Solution conformation of purine-pyrimidine DNA octamers using nuclear magnetic resonance, restrained molecular dynamics and NOE-based refinement.

J D Baleja1, M W Germann, J H van de Sande, B D Sykes.   

Abstract

The solution structures of two alternating purine-pyrimidine octamers, [d(G-T-A-C-G-T-A-C)]2 and the reverse sequence [d(C-A-T-G-C-A-T-G)]2, are investigated by using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and restrained molecular dynamics calculations. Chemical shift assignments are obtained for non-exchangeable protons by a combination of two-dimensional correlation and nuclear Overhauser enhancement (NOE) spectroscopy experiments. Distances between protons are estimated by extrapolating distances derived from time-dependent NOE measurements to zero mixing time. Approximate dihedral angles are determined within the deoxyribose ring from coupling constants observed in one and two-dimensional spectra. Sets of distance and dihedral determinations for each of the duplexes form the bases for structure determination. Molecular dynamics is then used to generate structures that satisfy the experimental restraints incorporated as effective potentials into the total energy. Separate runs start from classical A and B-form DNA and converge to essentially identical structures. To circumvent the problems of spin diffusion and differential motion associated with distance measurements within molecules, models are improved by NOE-based refinement in which observed NOE intensities are compared to those calculated using a full matrix analysis procedure. The refined structures generally have the global features of B-type DNA. Some, but not all, variations in dihedral angles and in the spatial relationships of adjacent base-pairs are observed to be in synchrony with the alternating purine-pyrimidine sequence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2231713     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2836(05)80361-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  6 in total

1.  Sequence-dependent variation in DNA minor groove width dictates orientational preference of Hoechst 33258 in A-tract recognition: solution NMR structure of the 2:1 complex with d(CTTTTGCAAAAG)(2).

Authors:  E Gavathiotis; G J Sharman; M S Searle
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Simulation of NOESY spectra of DNA segments: a new scaling procedure for iterative comparison of calculated and experimental NOE intensities.

Authors:  R Nibedita; R A Kumar; A Majumdar; R V Hosur
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.835

3.  Analysis of (1)H chemical shifts in DNA: Assessment of the reliability of (1)H chemical shift calculations for use in structure refinement.

Authors:  S S Wijmenga; M Kruithof; C W Hilbers
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.835

4.  How is an NMR structure best defined? An analysis of molecular dynamics distance-based approaches.

Authors:  D A Pearlman
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.835

5.  Insights into Watson-Crick/Hoogsteen breathing dynamics and damage repair from the solution structure and dynamic ensemble of DNA duplexes containing m1A.

Authors:  Bharathwaj Sathyamoorthy; Honglue Shi; Huiqing Zhou; Yi Xue; Atul Rangadurai; Dawn K Merriman; Hashim M Al-Hashimi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Quantitative comparison of experimental and simulated NOE intensities: correlation with accuracy of oligonucleotide structure determination.

Authors:  R Nibedita; R A Kumar; A Majumdar; R V Hosur
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.835

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.