Literature DB >> 2231620

Comparative field evaluation of permethrin and deet-treated military uniforms for personal protection against ticks (Acari).

S R Evans1, G W Korch, M A Lawson.   

Abstract

The effectiveness of permethrin-impregnated (PI) versus permethrin-sprayed (PS) military battle dress uniforms was evaluated in protecting soldiers from tick bite. At the same time, an extended-duration formulation of N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (deet), when applied to clothing only, was evaluated and compared with the permethrin-treated uniforms. Testing consisted of exposing subjects, clothed in either untreated or the variously treated uniforms, to field populations of ticks during a series of 30-min field trials over a period of 21 d during July and August 1988. Permethrin, applied as either a spray (0.5% [AI]), or as an impregnant (0.125% [AI]/cm2), was more effective than deet (33.25% [AI]) applied to clothing only in protecting individuals from tick bite. The mean numbers of ticks on deet-treated, PI, and PS uniforms were 60, 97, and 98% lower, respectively, than on untreated uniforms against all encountered life stages of Amblyomma americanum (L), Dermacentor variabilis (Say), and Ixodes dammini Spielman, Clifford, Piesman and Corwin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2231620     DOI: 10.1093/jmedent/27.5.829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Entomol        ISSN: 0022-2585            Impact factor:   2.278


  15 in total

1.  Evidence for Personal Protective Measures to Reduce Human Contact With Blacklegged Ticks and for Environmentally Based Control Methods to Suppress Host-Seeking Blacklegged Ticks and Reduce Infection with Lyme Disease Spirochetes in Tick Vectors and Rodent Reservoirs.

Authors:  Lars Eisen; Marc C Dolan
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.278

2.  Passive prophylaxis with permethrin-treated tents reduces mosquito bites among North American summer campers.

Authors:  David R Boulware; Arthur A Beisang
Journal:  Wilderness Environ Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.518

3.  Bioassays to evaluate non-contact spatial repellency, contact irritancy, and acute toxicity of permethrin-treated clothing against nymphal Ixodes scapularis ticks.

Authors:  Lars Eisen; Dominic Rose; Robert Prose; Nicole E Breuner; Marc C Dolan; Karen Thompson; Neeta Connally
Journal:  Ticks Tick Borne Dis       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 3.744

4.  Aedes aegypti Mosquitoes Use Their Legs to Sense DEET on Contact.

Authors:  Emily J Dennis; Olivia V Goldman; Leslie B Vosshall
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Natural product studies of U.S. endangered plants: volatile components of Lindera melissifolia (Lauraceae) repel mosquitoes and ticks.

Authors:  Joonseok Oh; John J Bowling; John F Carroll; Betul Demirci; K Hüsnü Can Başer; Theodor D Leininger; Ulrich R Bernier; Mark T Hamann
Journal:  Phytochemistry       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 4.072

6.  New protective battle-dress impregnated against mosquito vector bites.

Authors:  Cédric Pennetier; Joseph Chabi; Thibaud Martin; Fabrice Chandre; Christophe Rogier; Jean-Marc Hougard; Frédéric Pages
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.876

7.  Efficacy of the new repellent BioUD against three species of ixodid ticks.

Authors:  B W Bissinger; C S Apperson; D E Sonenshine; D W Watson; R M Roe
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 2.132

8.  Bioactivity and laundering resistance of five commercially available, factory-treated permethrin-impregnated fabrics for the prevention of mosquito-borne diseases: the need for a standardized testing and licensing procedure.

Authors:  Michael K Faulde; Frederic Pages; Waltraud Uedelhoven
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 2.289

Review 9.  Prevention of lyme disease and other tick-borne infections.

Authors:  Roger P Clark; Linden T Hu
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.982

10.  Review of methods to prevent and reduce the risk of Lyme disease.

Authors:  L R Lindsay; N H Ogden; S W Schofield
Journal:  Can Commun Dis Rep       Date:  2015-06-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.