Literature DB >> 22316196

A review of stress-related mucosal disease.

Andrea A Monnig1, Jennifer E Prittie.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review and summarize the human and veterinary literature regarding stress-related mucosal disease (SRMD) pathogenesis, patient risk factors, and therapeutic options for prophylaxis and treatment. ETIOLOGY: SRMD is a common sequela of critical illness in human patients. Development of SRMD results from splanchnic hypoperfusion, reperfusion injury, and exposure of the gastric mucosa to acid, pepsin, and bile acids following breakdown of the gastric mucosal defense system. Human patients with the highest risk of stress ulceration include those with respiratory failure necessitating mechanical ventilation greater than 48 h or coagulopathy. Currently, little is known about the incidence and pathophysiology of SRMD in critically ill veterinary patients. DIAGNOSIS: A presumptive diagnosis can be made in high-risk patient populations following detection of occult or gross blood in nasogastric tube aspirates, hematemesis, or melena. Definitive diagnosis is achieved via esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Lesions are localized to the acid-producing portions of the stomach, the fundus, and body. THERAPY: Therapy is aimed at optimization of tissue perfusion and oxygenation. Pharmacologic interventions are instituted to increase intraluminal pH and augment natural gastric defenses. Histamine(2)-receptor antagonists, proton pump inhibitors, and sucralfate are the mainstays of therapy. In people, clinically significant bleeding may necessitate additional interventions (eg, packed red blood cell transfusions, endoscopic, or surgical hemostasis). PROGNOSIS: Mortality is increased in people with clinically significant bleeding compared to those patients who do not bleed. Institution of prophylaxis is recommended in high-risk patients. However, no consensus exists regarding initiation of prophylaxis, preference of frontline drug class, or indication for discontinuation of therapy. The prognosis of veterinary patients with SRMD remains unknown at this time. © Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society 2011.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22316196     DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-4431.2011.00680.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio)        ISSN: 1476-4431


  7 in total

Review 1.  Stress ulcer prophylaxis, thromboprophylaxis and coagulation management in patients with hip fractures.

Authors:  Heinrich Wolfgang Thaler; Peter Dovjak; Bernhard Iglseder; Georg Pinter; Ernst Müller; Walter Müller; Katharina Pils; Peter Mikosch; Inge Gerstorfer; Michaela Zmaritz; Monique Weissenberger-Leduc; Markus Gosch
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2013-09-04

2.  Ganoderma lucidum Pharmacopuncture for the Treatment of Acute Gastric Ulcers in Rats.

Authors:  Jae-Heung Park; Kyung-Jun Jang; Cheol-Hong Kim; Yoo-Hwan Lee; Soo-Jung Lee; Bum-Hoi Kim; Hyun-Min Yoon
Journal:  J Pharmacopuncture       Date:  2014-09

3.  Efficacy of intravenous administration of combined acid suppressants in healthy dogs.

Authors:  M K Tolbert; A Odunayo; R S Howell; E E Peters; A Reed
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  Effect of sucralfate on gastric permeability in an ex vivo model of stress-related mucosal disease in dogs.

Authors:  Tracy L Hill; B Duncan X Lascelles; Anthony T Blikslager
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  Esomeprazole alleviates the damage to stress ulcer in rats through not only its antisecretory effect but its antioxidant effect by inactivating the p38 MAPK and NF-κB signaling pathways.

Authors:  Wei Xie; Xielin Huang; Renpin Chen; Ruru Chen; Tang Li; Wei Wu; Zhiming Huang
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 4.162

6.  ACVIM consensus statement: Support for rational administration of gastrointestinal protectants to dogs and cats.

Authors:  Stanley L Marks; Peter H Kook; Mark G Papich; M K Tolbert; Michael D Willard
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Acupuncture at Back-Shu and Front-Mu Acupoints Prevents Gastric Ulcer by Regulating the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB Signaling Pathway.

Authors:  Li Li; Hao Zang; Yang Jiang; Yue Zhang; Shuangshuang Mu; Jiazhen Cao; Ying Qu; Zhaohui Wang; Wei Qi
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 2.629

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.