OBJECTIVES: Among patients with long-term conditions, to determine the prevalence and benefits of care planning discussions and of care plans. METHODS: Data from the 2009/10 General Practice Patient Survey, a cross sectional survey of 5.5 million patients in England. Outcomes were patient reports of: care planning discussions; perceived benefit from care planning discussions and resultant care plans. Patient and practice variables were included in multilevel logistic regression to investigate predictors of each outcome. RESULTS: Half the respondents (49%) reported a long-term condition and were eligible to answer the care planning questions. Of these, 84% reported having a care planning discussion during the last 12 months and most reported some benefit. Only 12% who reported a care planning discussion also reported being told they had a care plan. Patients who reported having a care plan were more likely to report benefits from care planning discussions. Several factors predicted the reporting of care planning and care plans of which the most important was patients' reports of the quality of interpersonal care. CONCLUSIONS: There is a gap between policy and current practice which might reflect uncertainty as to the benefits of care plans. There is, therefore, a need for rigorous evaluation of care plans.
OBJECTIVES: Among patients with long-term conditions, to determine the prevalence and benefits of care planning discussions and of care plans. METHODS: Data from the 2009/10 General Practice Patient Survey, a cross sectional survey of 5.5 million patients in England. Outcomes were patient reports of: care planning discussions; perceived benefit from care planning discussions and resultant care plans. Patient and practice variables were included in multilevel logistic regression to investigate predictors of each outcome. RESULTS: Half the respondents (49%) reported a long-term condition and were eligible to answer the care planning questions. Of these, 84% reported having a care planning discussion during the last 12 months and most reported some benefit. Only 12% who reported a care planning discussion also reported being told they had a care plan. Patients who reported having a care plan were more likely to report benefits from care planning discussions. Several factors predicted the reporting of care planning and care plans of which the most important was patients' reports of the quality of interpersonal care. CONCLUSIONS: There is a gap between policy and current practice which might reflect uncertainty as to the benefits of care plans. There is, therefore, a need for rigorous evaluation of care plans.
Authors: Ashley N Saucier; Benjamin Ansa; Janis Coffin; Mariam Akhtar; Andre Miller; Holly Mahoney; Denise M Hodo; Carla Duffie; Brittney Fontenot; Holly E Andrews; Selina A Smith Journal: Eur J Pers Cent Healthc Date: 2017
Authors: Jenni Burt; Jo Rick; Thomas Blakeman; Joanne Protheroe; Martin Roland; Pete Bower Journal: Prim Health Care Res Dev Date: 2013-07-24 Impact factor: 1.458
Authors: Nina Tusa; Hannu Kautiainen; Pia Elfving; Sanna Sinikallio; Pekka Mäntyselkä Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2021-07-20 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Jo Rick; Kelly Rowe; Mark Hann; Bonnie Sibbald; David Reeves; Martin Roland; Peter Bower Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2012-08-31 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: David Reeves; Mark Hann; Jo Rick; Kelly Rowe; Nicola Small; Jenni Burt; Martin Roland; Joanne Protheroe; Tom Blakeman; Gerry Richardson; Anne Kennedy; Peter Bower Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Jenny Newbould; Jenni Burt; Peter Bower; Tom Blakeman; Anne Kennedy; Anne Rogers; Martin Roland Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2012-07-25 Impact factor: 2.497