Literature DB >> 22315475

Commissioning processes in primary care trusts: a repeated cross-sectional survey of health care commissioners in England.

Fiona Sampson1, Alicia O'Cathain, Mark Strong, Mark Pickin, Lisa Esmonde.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the extent to which primary care trusts (PCTs) in England employed processes associated with quality commissioning and to assess whether changes occurred in these processes during a policy drive to improve commissioning.
METHODS: Telephone surveys of PCT managers leading commissioning for diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), coronary heart disease (CHD), and emergency and urgent care in all 152 PCTs in both 2009 and 2010.
RESULTS: The response rate was 51% (77/152) of PCTs in 2009 and 60% (91/152) in 2010. Two-thirds of commissioners had commissioned initiatives starting in the previous financial year. Over half of initiatives starting in 2008/09 had been instigated by the PCT alone. This reduced to a third in 2010, showing a shift towards partnership working. Commissioners reported that a large proportion of initiatives had been developed and shaped with the involvement of general practitioners (GPs) with direct links to the PCT and of specialist clinicians (70%), but that a lower proportion of initiatives had involvement from other GPs (40%). Patients or the public were less likely to be involved in initiatives than clinicians, but there was evidence of increasing involvement over the two years from 35% (52/149) to 51% (67/132) of initiatives. There was no evidence of changes in whether needs assessment was undertaken, how evidence was used or how initiatives were led and performance managed.
CONCLUSIONS: PCT commissioners reported clinical engagement in the majority of commissioning initiatives, a shift towards partnership commissioning, and increased involvement of patients and public in the development of initiatives. The new model of commissioning in England through clinical commissioning groups will need to improve on these processes if it is to demonstrate a higher quality approach to commissioning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22315475     DOI: 10.1258/jhsrp.2011.010191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy        ISSN: 1355-8196


  5 in total

1.  Researching Healthcare Availability for Probation Clients: An Illustration of Methodological Challenges and Lessons in Surveying Organisations.

Authors:  Coral Sirdifield; David Denney; Rebecca Marples; Charlie Brooker
Journal:  Br J Community Justice       Date:  2019-11-20

2.  Making the case for a fracture liaison service: a qualitative study of the experiences of clinicians and service managers.

Authors:  Sarah Drew; Rachael Gooberman-Hill; Andrew Farmer; Laura Graham; M Kassim Javaid; Cyrus Cooper; Andrew Judge
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  The work of commissioning: a multisite case study of healthcare commissioning in England's NHS.

Authors:  Sara E Shaw; Judith A Smith; Alison Porter; Rebecca Rosen; Nicholas Mays
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Do marginal investments made by NHS healthcare commissioners in the UK produce the outcomes they hope to achieve? Observational study.

Authors:  Alicia O'Cathain; Fiona Sampson; Mark Strong; Mark Pickin; Elizabeth Goyder; Simon Dixon
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  What's Needed to Develop Strategic Purchasing in Healthcare? Policy Lessons from a Realist Review.

Authors:  Joe Sanderson; Chris Lonsdale; Russell Mannion
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2019-01-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.