Sarah A Keim1, Nathan T Pruitt. 1. The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Center for Biobehavioral Health, Columbus, OH, USA. sarah.keim@nationwidechildrens.org
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Institute of Medicine (IOM) recently revised gestational weight gain (GWG) guidelines, yet little is known about the association between extremes of GWG and child cognition. METHODS: The authors examined this association using U.S. Collaborative Perinatal Project data (1959-73). Women with a calculable GWG and term, singleton children were eligible for inclusion. Children (31 968 individuals, including 8704 siblings) were assessed at 4 (Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, Graham-Ernhart Block Sort Test) and 7 years of age [Wechsler Intelligence Scales for Children, Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT)]. Multiple regression with restricted cubic splines and generalized estimating equations (GEEs) was used. Fixed-effects (FE) models were also applied to control for confounders shared within sibships. RESULTS: GWG displayed non-linear inverted U-shaped associations with most outcomes when the data were analysed using GEE, suggesting a detrimental influence of low and high GWG on cognition. After controlling for familial factors (FE), all associations were null except for a positive linear association between GWG above the IOM-recommended ranges and WRAT spelling (β = 1.41, 95% confidence interval: 0.13, 2.70). CONCLUSIONS: Familial factors are important confounders of the association between GWG and cognitive development at 4 and 7 years of age. After controlling for such factors, GWG was generally unassociated with child development.
BACKGROUND: The Institute of Medicine (IOM) recently revised gestational weight gain (GWG) guidelines, yet little is known about the association between extremes of GWG and child cognition. METHODS: The authors examined this association using U.S. Collaborative Perinatal Project data (1959-73). Women with a calculable GWG and term, singleton children were eligible for inclusion. Children (31 968 individuals, including 8704 siblings) were assessed at 4 (Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, Graham-Ernhart Block Sort Test) and 7 years of age [Wechsler Intelligence Scales for Children, Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT)]. Multiple regression with restricted cubic splines and generalized estimating equations (GEEs) was used. Fixed-effects (FE) models were also applied to control for confounders shared within sibships. RESULTS: GWG displayed non-linear inverted U-shaped associations with most outcomes when the data were analysed using GEE, suggesting a detrimental influence of low and high GWG on cognition. After controlling for familial factors (FE), all associations were null except for a positive linear association between GWG above the IOM-recommended ranges and WRAT spelling (β = 1.41, 95% confidence interval: 0.13, 2.70). CONCLUSIONS: Familial factors are important confounders of the association between GWG and cognitive development at 4 and 7 years of age. After controlling for such factors, GWG was generally unassociated with child development.
Authors: Nicki Aubuchon-Endsley; Monique Morales; Christina Giudice; Margaret H Bublitz; Barry M Lester; Amy L Salisbury; Laura R Stroud Journal: Matern Child Nutr Date: 2016-05-10 Impact factor: 3.092
Authors: Stefanie N Hinkle; Paul S Albert; Lindsey A Sjaarda; Jagteshwar Grewal; Katherine L Grantz Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2016-01-12 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Sarah J Pugh; Jennifer A Hutcheon; Gale A Richardson; Maria M Brooks; Katherine P Himes; Nancy L Day; Lisa M Bodnar Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2016-01-04 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Sarah J Pugh; Gale A Richardson; Jennifer A Hutcheon; Katherine P Himes; Maria M Brooks; Nancy L Day; Lisa M Bodnar Journal: J Nutr Date: 2015-09-30 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Heejoo Jo; Laura A Schieve; Andrea J Sharma; Stefanie N Hinkle; Ruowei Li; Jennifer N Lind Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Cheryl K Walker; Catherine A VandeVoort; Chin-Shang Li; Charles L Chaffin; John P Capitanio Journal: Dev Psychobiol Date: 2018-06-13 Impact factor: 3.038
Authors: R N Lippert; S Hess; P Klemm; L M Burgeno; T Jahans-Price; M E Walton; P Kloppenburg; J C Brüning Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 14.808