Literature DB >> 22314011

Ventricular assist device therapy in post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock: historical outcomes and current trends.

Abdul Nasir1, Pramod Bonde, Alastair N J Graham.   

Abstract

Ventricular assist device (VAD) therapy has been used successfully as a bridge to recovery, bridge to transplant and in the last decade as a destination therapy. The use of VAD for post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCCS) is not currently reported in national databases in the UK and Ireland. Data were collected through a telephone survey of chief perfusionists from all the cardiac surgery units in the UK and Ireland between October 2007 and October 2008. Approximately 28 000 adult cardiac surgical procedures were performed at 45 cardiac centres, of which 33 (73%) reported using VAD. The total number of patients supported was 66, of which 41% (n = 27) survived to be discharged home. About 42.5% (n = 28) died during VAD in place, and 16.5% died after successful weaning from VAD. Preferences for device types were Biomedicus (n = 25), Levitronix (n = 10), Sorin (n = 3), roller pump (n = 3) and Berlin heart (n = 2). Despite the reasonable survival rates after VAD use in post-cardiotomy heart failure, there are significant differences in their availability and individual's attitude towards their use. VAD use in PCCS should be prospectively documented in the audit returns of all the units, for further analysis and for generation of protocols.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22314011      PMCID: PMC3329302          DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivr150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  3 in total

1.  Left ventricular assist device bridge-to-transplant network improves survival after failed cardiotomy.

Authors:  D N Helman; D L Morales; N M Edwards; D M Mancini; J M Chen; E A Rose; M C Oz
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  A decade of short-term outcomes in post cardiac surgery ventricular assist device implantation: data from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons' National Cardiac Database.

Authors:  Adrian F Hernandez; Joshua D Grab; James S Gammie; Sean M O'Brien; Bradley G Hammill; Joseph G Rogers; Margarita T Camacho; Mercedes K Dullum; T Bruce Ferguson; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-07-23       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  ABIOMED BVS 5000: experience and potential advantages.

Authors:  G K Jett
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.330

  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  Short-term ventricular assist device in post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock: factors influencing survival.

Authors:  Prashant N Mohite; Anton Sabashnikov; Nikhil P Patil; Diana García Sáez; Bartlomiej Zych; Aron F Popov; Alexander Weymann; Thorsten Wahlers; Nandor Marczin; Fabio DeRobertis; Toufan Bahrami; Mohamed Amrani; André R Simon
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 1.731

2.  Past and present of cardiocirculatory assist devices: a comprehensive critical review.

Authors:  Gianluca Rigatelli; Francesco Santini; Giuseppe Faggian
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.327

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.