Literature DB >> 22314002

Factors influencing time to determination of the recommended phase 2 dose in phase 1 clinical trials.

Samantha Caldwell1, Chao Sima, Gayle Jameson, Sharon Fleck, Glen J Weiss.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cancer clinical trials are the means to develop safe and effective novel treatment options for patients. The longer it takes for these trials to reach the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), the fewer therapy options are available to patients and physicians. The purpose of this study is to examine the factors that delay RP2D determination in phase 1 clinical trials.
METHODS: Thirty-five consecutive phase 1 clinical trials for advanced solid tumors that started between February 2006 and March 2009 in a single institution were examined for inclusion. Factors potentially contributing to trial delays were analyzed against time to determination of an RP2D (TDR).
RESULTS: Thirty-one phase 1 clinical trials met the inclusion criteria and were included in the statistical analysis. Investigational agents under evaluation included single agent cytotoxic (N=4), monoclonal antibody (N=3), single agent cytostatic/targeted (N=16), or combination of an investigational agent and commercially available systemic chemotherapy (N=8). A protocol defined phase 2 dose decreased the TDR (P<0.001). Other factors that significantly increased TDR included a larger minimum estimated patient sample size (P=0.022), a greater number of predefined dose levels (P<0.001), and a higher number of expansion cohorts (P=0.038).
CONCLUSIONS: Including a predefined phase 2 dose and reducing the number of dose levels and expansion cohorts may shorten phase 1 trial TDR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22314002     DOI: 10.1097/COC.0b013e31824370a3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0277-3732            Impact factor:   2.339


  2 in total

1.  Use of Expansion Cohorts in Phase I Trials and Probability of Success in Phase II for 381 Anticancer Drugs.

Authors:  Diogo D G Bugano; Kenneth Hess; Denis L F Jardim; Alona Zer; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Lillian L Siu; Albiruni R A Razak; David S Hong
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Examining the effect of teleconferences on oncology phase 1 trials.

Authors:  Alexandra McKane; Chao Sima; Sharon Fleck; Glen J Weiss
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 4.207

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.