Literature DB >> 22313794

Regeneration of uterine cervix at 6 months after large loop excision of the transformation zone for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

D Papoutsis1, A Rodolakis, S Mesogitis, M Sotiropoulou, A Antsaklis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To sonographically investigate cervical regeneration 6 months after large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) conisation for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) pathology.
DESIGN: Prospective observational study.
SETTING: University Hospital setting. POPULATION: Women having LLETZ conisation for intraepithelial lesions in response to abnormal Papanicolaou smears or colposcopic findings.
METHODS: Cervical dimensions were estimated before conisation and at 6 months with three-dimensional sonography and use of vocal™ software. Cone depth was measured using a ruler before fixation, and cone volume was measured using a volumetric tube and the fluid displacement technique. Cervical regeneration was sonographically estimated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Correlation of cervical volume regeneration with percentage of initial cervical volume excised and remaining cervical tissue immediately after conisation.
RESULTS: A cohort of 112 women were initially recruited over a 2-year period and 73 women presented for ultrasound follow up at 6 months. Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that for women matched for age and initial cervical volume, if cervical volume excised was increased by 1% then regeneration of tissue deficit at the cervical crater was reduced by 1.37%. There also seemed to be a cutoff point suggesting that when >14% of initial cervical volume was excised, the tissue deficit at the cervical crater at 6 months was restored by <75% and there was >25% of remaining tissue deficit.
CONCLUSIONS: Cervical regeneration at 6 months after excision is dependent on the percentage of initial cervical volume excised and on the remaining cervical tissue immediately after conisation. The greater the cone and the less cervical tissue remaining, the less the degree of cervical regeneration achieved.
© 2012 The Authors BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology © 2012 RCOG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22313794     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03275.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  7 in total

1.  Interval from loop electrosurgical excision procedure to pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Shayna N Conner; Alison G Cahill; Methodius G Tuuli; David M Stamilio; Anthony O Odibo; Kimberly A Roehl; George A Macones
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Healing pattern of the cervical stroma following cold coagulation treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A case report.

Authors:  Dimitrios Papoutsis; Joanna Williams; Martyn Underwood; William Parry-Smith
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  A prospective study of treatments for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and fecundability.

Authors:  Lauren A Wise; Sydney K Willis; Rebecca B Perkins; Amelia K Wesselink; Alexandra Klann; Holly M Crowe; Kristen A Hahn; Ellen M Mikkelsen; Elizabeth E Hatch
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-12-28       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Tracking the Impact of Excisional Cervical Treatment on the Cervix using Biospectroscopy.

Authors:  Diane E Halliwell; Maria Kyrgiou; Anita Mitra; Ilkka Kalliala; Evangelos Paraskevaidis; Georgios Theophilou; Pierre L Martin-Hirsch; Francis L Martin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  The vaginal microbiota and innate immunity after local excisional treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Anita Mitra; David A MacIntyre; Maria Paraskevaidi; Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Vishakha Mahajan; Ann Smith; Yun S Lee; Deirdre Lyons; Evangelos Paraskevaidis; Julian R Marchesi; Phillip R Bennett; Maria Kyrgiou
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 11.117

Review 6.  Literature Review of Cervical Regeneration after Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure, and Study Project (CeVaLEP) Proposal.

Authors:  Laura Lūse; Anda Ķīvīte Urtāne; Ija Lisovaja; Irina Jermakova; Gilbert G G Donders; Natālija Vedmedovska
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 4.964

7.  Effect of age and cone dimensions on cervical regeneration: an Italian multicentric prospective observational study.

Authors:  Andrea Ciavattini; Giovanni Delli Carpini; Lorenzo Moriconi; Nicolò Clemente; Nina Montik; Rosa De Vincenzo; Anna Del Fabro; Monica Buttignol; Caterina Ricci; Francesca Moro; Francesco Sopracordevole
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.