Literature DB >> 22313536

The importance of measuring macroprolactin in the differential diagnosis of hyperprolactinemic patients.

Chih-Chin Lu1, Ching-Jung Hsieh.   

Abstract

This study investigated the differences in clinical and laboratory features as well as treatment response in 70 outpatients with macroprolactinemia and monomeric hyperprolactinemia treated with dopamine agonists. After precipitation of the patients' serum samples with poly-ethylene-glycol (PEG), serum prolactin (PRL) levels were measured. We also measured serum levels of luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), estradiol for women and testosterone for men. Clinical symptoms and signs were recorded. All patients received brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). After excluding patients with macroadenoma, 66 patients were treated with the dopamine agonist cabergoline. After 1 year, the clinical responses to cabergoline were recorded and PRL levels measured. Of the initial 70 patients with hyperprolactinemia, 15 patients (21.4%) were found to have macroprolactinemia, while the rest had monomeric hyperprolactinemia. The two groups did not differ with regard to galactorrhea, menstrual disturbances or impotence. There were no significant group differences in serum LH, FSH, estradiol or testosterone levels. Patients with macroprolactinemia, however, had a significantly lower infertility rate than those with true hyperprolactinemia (6.7% vs. 32.7%, p=0.005). A greater percentage of macroprolactinemic patients had normal MRI pituitary images than those with hyperprolactinemia (73.3% vs. 34.5%, p=0.029). Compared to those with true hyperprolactinemia, patients with macroprolactinemia were found to have no significant changes in clinical features and PRL levels after 1 year of cabergoline therapy (after PEG precipitation, pre- and post-PRL levels: 59.3 ± 100.2 to 13.8 ± 9.5 ng/mL vs. 6.1 ± 5.3 to 5.1 ± 4.3 ng/mL, p=0.002). In conclusion, while macroprolactinemia is a common cause of hyperprolactinemia, many clinical and laboratory features cannot be used reliably to differentiate macroprolactinemia from true hyperprolactinemia. Routine screening for all hyperprolactinemic sera with PEG might prevent the unnecessary use of image studies and medical treatments for people with hyperprolactinemia.
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22313536     DOI: 10.1016/j.kjms.2011.10.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kaohsiung J Med Sci        ISSN: 1607-551X            Impact factor:   2.744


  4 in total

1.  Sexual function and depressive symptoms in young women with elevated macroprolactin content: a pilot study.

Authors:  Robert Krysiak; Agnieszka Drosdzol-Cop; Violetta Skrzypulec-Plinta; Bogusław Okopien
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 2.  Global Prevalence of Macroprolactinemia among Patients with Hyperprolactinemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Noor Azlin Azraini Che Soh; Najib Majdi Yaacob; Julia Omar; Aniza Mohammed Jelani; Noorazliyana Shafii; Tuan Salwani Tuan Ismail; Wan Norlina Wan Azman; Anis Kausar Ghazali
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Prolactin Level in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS): An approach to the diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Zahra Davoudi; Farnaz Araghi; Maryam Vahedi; Navid Mokhtari; Mehdi Gheisari
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2021-11-03

4.  Hyperprolactinaemia in male infertility: Clinical case scenarios.

Authors:  Zeinab Dabbous; Stephen L Atkin
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2017-11-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.