Literature DB >> 22313492

Evaluation of the antifungal susceptibility of Malassezia pachydermatis to clotrimazole, miconazole and thiabendazole using a modified CLSI M27-A3 microdilution method.

Andrea Peano1, Massimo Beccati, Elisa Chiavassa, Mario Pasquetti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In this study, we evaluated the antifungal susceptibility of Malassezia pachydermatis to clotrimazole (CTZ), miconazole (MCZ), and thiabendazole (TBD), azole derivatives employed in aural formulations labeled for treatment of canine otitis.
METHODS: The procedure for in vitro testing was based on the indications of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M27-A3 microdilution method. A lipid-enriched medium was employed to enhance the yeast growth (Christensen's urea broth, with 0.1% Tween 80 and 0.5% Tween 40 as the lipid sources), while the inoculums size corresponded to approximately 1-5 × 10(5) yeast cells/mL. Microplates were incubated at 37°C and read 48 h after inoculation. Azole MICs inhibiting fungal growth were the lowest drug concentrations that showed an optical density of ≤ 50% of the (drug-free) growth control, as assessed by spectrophotometer (630 nm filter).
RESULTS: All isolates were inhibited by the three azoles, with different minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values. Most isolates were inhibited by drug concentrations of 2-8 (CTZ), 1-4 (MCZ), or 16-32 (TBD) μg/mL. These results are partially in agreement with the findings of previous studies, in which substantially higher/lower MICs were occasionally reported. This is likely because of the different methodologies employed. Such discrepancies may not apply to clinical situations, where the compounds are applied topically. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: The concept that clinical failure is linked to increased MICs is debatable, because significantly higher concentrations (in most cases at least 1,000 × the MIC) of the antifungals that were included in our study are routinely used in formulated products.
© 2012 The Authors. Veterinary Dermatology. © 2012 ESVD and ACVD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22313492     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2011.01025.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Dermatol        ISSN: 0959-4493            Impact factor:   1.589


  5 in total

1.  In vitro amphotericin B susceptibility of Malassezia pachydermatis determined by the CLSI broth microdilution method and Etest using lipid-enriched media.

Authors:  Sergio Álvarez-Pérez; José L Blanco; Teresa Peláez; Maite Cutuli; Marta E García
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Agar Diffusion Procedures for Susceptibility Testing of Malassezia pachydermatis: Evaluation of Mueller-Hinton Agar Plus 2 % Glucose and 0.5 µg/ml Methylene Blue as the Test Medium.

Authors:  M Pasquetti; E Chiavassa; P Tizzani; P Danesi; A Peano
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 2.574

3.  In vitro antifungal susceptibility of Malassezia pachydermatis strains isolated from dogs with chronic and acute otitis externa.

Authors:  E Chiavassa; P Tizzani; A Peano
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 2.574

4.  Clinical evaluation of an antiinflammatory and antioxidant diet effect in 30 dogs affected by chronic otitis externa: preliminary results.

Authors:  Alessandro Di Cerbo; Sara Centenaro; Francesca Beribè; Fulvio Laus; Matteo Cerquetella; Andrea Spaterna; Gianandrea Guidetti; Sergio Canello; Giuseppe Terrazzano
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 2.459

Review 5.  Methodological Issues in Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Malassezia pachydermatis.

Authors:  Andrea Peano; Mario Pasquetti; Paolo Tizzani; Elisa Chiavassa; Jacques Guillot; Elizabeth Johnson
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2017-07-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.