Literature DB >> 2231321

Comparison of methods to calculate cyclosporine A bioavailability from consecutive oral and intravenous doses.

M O Karlsson1, A Lindberg-Freijs.   

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine A (CyA) was studied in 21 uremic patients. The plasma concentrations after an oral dose and a subsequent short-term infusion were analyzed simultaneously by nonlinear regression. Bi- and triexponential disposition models with either zero- or first-order absorption were fitted to the data. A triexponential disposition model with zero-order absorption was generally found to best describe the concentration-time profile. The bioavailability and clearance were estimated to be 0.24 +/- 0.10 and 21 +/- 8 L/hr, respectively. These values differed only marginally from those predicted by the other models. Similar bioavailability estimates were also obtained from a three-compartment model where elimination was assumed saturable, from a deconvolution procedure, and from analyses based on blood concentrations. Markedly higher bioavailabilities (0.34 +/- 0.13) were obtained when a model-independent AUC correction procedure, commonly used to calculate CyA bioavailability, was used. The difference could not be explained by poor description of data in the model-dependent analyses, but rather by overestimation in the model-independent analyses mainly due to errors in the extrapolations used. Thus, by the simultaneous fitting procedure, which is a new approach for estimating CyA bioavailability, drawbacks of the AUC correction procedure could be avoided. Further, future studies of CyA bioavailability could be designed with a markedly shorter and more convenient length of time if analyzed by the proposed method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2231321     DOI: 10.1007/bf01062270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm        ISSN: 0090-466X


  35 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine A in patients with nephrotic syndrome.

Authors:  L Vernillet; B Moulin; C Dadoun; J F Le Bigot; J P Fillastre
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 1.066

2.  Enhanced intestinal absorption of cyclosporine in rats through the reduction of emulsion droplet size.

Authors:  B D Tarr; S H Yalkowsky
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Cyclosporine pharmacokinetics in the early course of renal transplantation.

Authors:  K Albrecht; W Niebel; G Marggraf; F W Eigler
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 1.066

4.  Pharmacokinetics of oral cyclosporin A (Sandimmun) in healthy subjects.

Authors:  J Grevel; E Nüesch; E Abisch; K Kutz
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  The pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine A in uremic patients.

Authors:  A Lindberg; B Odlind; G Tufveson; B Lindström; J Gabrielsson
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 1.066

6.  Estimation of drug absorption rates using a deconvolution method with nonequal sampling times.

Authors:  K Iga; Y Ogawa; T Yashiki; T Shimamoto
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1986-04

Review 7.  Individualization of cyclosporine therapy using pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters.

Authors:  B D Kahan
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Application of Akaike's information criterion (AIC) in the evaluation of linear pharmacokinetic equations.

Authors:  K Yamaoka; T Nakagawa; T Uno
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1978-04

9.  Cyclosporine kinetics in renal transplantation.

Authors:  R J Ptachcinski; R Venkataramanan; J T Rosenthal; G J Burckart; R J Taylor; T R Hakala
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  Pharmacokinetics of intravenous cyclosporine in bone marrow transplant patients. Comparison of two assay methods.

Authors:  G C Yee; M S Kennedy; R Storb; E D Thomas
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 4.939

View more
  6 in total

1.  Comparison of some practical sampling strategies for population pharmacokinetic studies.

Authors:  E N Jonsson; J R Wade; M O Karlsson
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1996-04

2.  Explaining variability in ciclosporin exposure in adult kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  Rogier R Press; Bart A Ploeger; Jan den Hartigh; T van der Straaten; Hans van Pelt; Meindert Danhof; Hans de Fijter; Henk-Jan Guchelaar
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Bioavailability of flumequine after semisimultaneous administration to veal calves.

Authors:  B A Meijer; K G Ceyssens; W T de Jong; B I de Grève
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Chronopharmacokinetics of Cyclosporine A in the Wistar rat following oral administration.

Authors:  M F Malmary; K Kabbaj; C Labat; A Batalla; I Houti; S Moussamih; J Oustrin
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  1992 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.441

5.  Absorption and in vivo dissolution of hydroxycholoroquine in fed subjects assessed using deconvolution techniques.

Authors:  A J McLachlan; S E Tett; D J Cutler; R O Day
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 6.  Cyclosporin clinical pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  A Fahr
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 6.447

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.