Literature DB >> 22313205

Three-dimensional electromagnetic navigation vs. fluoroscopy for endovascular aneurysm repair: a prospective feasibility study in patients.

Frode Manstad-Hulaas1, Geir Arne Tangen, Torbjørn Dahl, Toril A N Hernes, Petter Aadahl.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the in vivo feasibility of a 3-dimensional (3D) electromagnetic (EM) navigation system with electromagnetically-tracked catheters in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).
METHODS: The pilot study included 17 patients undergoing EVAR with a bifurcated stent-graft. Ten patients were assigned to the control group, in which a standard EVAR procedure was used. The remaining 7 patients (intervention group) underwent an EVAR procedure during which a cone-beam computed tomography image was acquired after implantation of the main stent-graft. The 3D image was presented on the navigation screen. From the contralateral side, the tip of an electromagnetically-tracked catheter was visualized in the 3D image and positioned in front of the contralateral cuff in the main stent-graft. A guidewire was inserted through the catheter and blindly placed into the stent-graft. The placement of the guidewire was verified by fluoroscopy before the catheter was pushed over the guidewire. If the guidewire was incorrectly placed outside the stent-graft, the procedure was repeated. Successful placement of the guidewire had to be achieved within a 15-minute time limit.
RESULTS: Within 15 minutes, the guidewire was placed correctly inside the stent-graft in 6 of 7 patients in the intervention group and in 8 of 10 patients in the control group. In the intervention group, fewer attempts were needed to insert the guidewire correctly.
CONCLUSION: A 3D EM navigation system, used in conjunction with fluoroscopy and angiography, has the potential to provide more spatial information and reduce the use of radiation and contrast during endovascular interventions. This pilot study showed that 3D EM navigation is feasible in patients undergoing EVAR. However, a larger study must be performed to determine if 3D EM navigation is better than the existing practice for these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22313205     DOI: 10.1583/11-3557.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endovasc Ther        ISSN: 1526-6028            Impact factor:   3.487


  8 in total

1.  Electromagnetic navigation versus fluoroscopy in aortic endovascular procedures: a phantom study.

Authors:  Kjetil Tystad Lund; Geir Arne Tangen; Frode Manstad-Hulaas
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Image guidance for endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms: comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional angiography and image fusion.

Authors:  Vania Tacher; MingDe Lin; Pascal Desgranges; Jean-Francois Deux; Thijs Grünhagen; Jean-Pierre Becquemin; Alain Luciani; Alain Rahmouni; Hicham Kobeiter
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.464

3.  The Essential Role of Open Data and Software for the Future of Ultrasound-Based Neuronavigation.

Authors:  Ingerid Reinertsen; D Louis Collins; Simon Drouin
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 4.  Bioengineering, augmented reality, and robotic surgery in vascular surgery: A literature review.

Authors:  Sara Condino; Roberta Piazza; Marina Carbone; Jonathan Bath; Nicola Troisi; Mauro Ferrari; Raffaella Berchiolli
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-08-19

5.  The Current Era of Endovascular Aortic Interventions and What the Future Holds.

Authors:  Martin Teraa; Constantijn E V B Hazenberg
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 4.964

6.  Three-Dimensional Holographic Guidance, Navigation, and Control (3D-GNC) for Endograft Positioning in Porcine Aorta: Feasibility Comparison With 2-Dimensional X-Ray Fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Karl West; Sara Al-Nimer; Vikash R Goel; Jeffrey H Yanof; Aydan T Hanlon; Crew J Weunski; Jackie Kattar; Behzad S Farivar
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 3.487

Review 7.  CustusX: an open-source research platform for image-guided therapy.

Authors:  Christian Askeland; Ole Vegard Solberg; Janne Beate Lervik Bakeng; Ingerid Reinertsen; Geir Arne Tangen; Erlend Fagertun Hofstad; Daniel Høyer Iversen; Cecilie Våpenstad; Tormod Selbekk; Thomas Langø; Toril A Nagelhus Hernes; Håkon Olav Leira; Geirmund Unsgård; Frank Lindseth
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  A novel platform for electromagnetic navigated ultrasound bronchoscopy (EBUS).

Authors:  Hanne Sorger; Erlend Fagertun Hofstad; Tore Amundsen; Thomas Langø; Håkon Olav Leira
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-11-28       Impact factor: 2.924

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.