Literature DB >> 22313125

A classification of bioinformatics algorithms from the viewpoint of maximizing expected accuracy (MEA).

Michiaki Hamada1, Kiyoshi Asai.   

Abstract

Many estimation problems in bioinformatics are formulated as point estimation problems in a high-dimensional discrete space. In general, it is difficult to design reliable estimators for this type of problem, because the number of possible solutions is immense, which leads to an extremely low probability for every solution-even for the one with the highest probability. Therefore, maximum score and maximum likelihood estimators do not work well in this situation although they are widely employed in a number of applications. Maximizing expected accuracy (MEA) estimation, in which accuracy measures of the target problem and the entire distribution of solutions are considered, is a more successful approach. In this review, we provide an extensive discussion of algorithms and software based on MEA. We describe how a number of algorithms used in previous studies can be classified from the viewpoint of MEA. We believe that this review will be useful not only for users wishing to utilize software to solve the estimation problems appearing in this article, but also for developers wishing to design algorithms on the basis of MEA.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22313125      PMCID: PMC3342518          DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2011.0197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Biol        ISSN: 1066-5277            Impact factor:   1.479


  73 in total

1.  Robust prediction of consensus secondary structures using averaged base pairing probability matrices.

Authors:  Hisanori Kiryu; Taishin Kin; Kiyoshi Asai
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 2.  Noncoding RNA transcription beyond annotated genes.

Authors:  Piero Carninci; Yoshihide Hayashizaki
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 3.  Computational prediction of protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Lucy Skrabanek; Harpreet K Saini; Gary D Bader; Anton J Enright
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 2.695

4.  Murlet: a practical multiple alignment tool for structural RNA sequences.

Authors:  Hisanori Kiryu; Yasuo Tabei; Taishin Kin; Kiyoshi Asai
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Efficient parameter estimation for RNA secondary structure prediction.

Authors:  Mirela Andronescu; Anne Condon; Holger H Hoos; David H Mathews; Kevin P Murphy
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Centroid estimation in discrete high-dimensional spaces with applications in biology.

Authors:  Luis E Carvalho; Charles E Lawrence
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Uncertainty in homology inferences: assessing and improving genomic sequence alignment.

Authors:  Gerton Lunter; Andrea Rocco; Naila Mimouni; Andreas Heger; Alexandre Caldeira; Jotun Hein
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  CONTRAST: a discriminative, phylogeny-free approach to multiple informant de novo gene prediction.

Authors:  Samuel S Gross; Chuong B Do; Marina Sirota; Serafim Batzoglou
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  MORPH: probabilistic alignment combined with hidden Markov models of cis-regulatory modules.

Authors:  Saurabh Sinha; Xin He
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2007-09-24       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  PARTS: probabilistic alignment for RNA joinT secondary structure prediction.

Authors:  Arif Ozgun Harmanci; Gaurav Sharma; David H Mathews
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  6 in total

1.  Accurate multiple network alignment through context-sensitive random walk.

Authors:  Hyundoo Jeong; Byung-Jun Yoon
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2015-01-21

2.  Sequence alignment by passing messages.

Authors:  Byung-Jun Yoon
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.969

3.  Efficient representation of uncertainty in multiple sequence alignments using directed acyclic graphs.

Authors:  Joseph L Herman; Ádám Novák; Rune Lyngsø; Adrienn Szabó; István Miklós; Jotun Hein
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  PhoglyStruct: Prediction of phosphoglycerylated lysine residues using structural properties of amino acids.

Authors:  Abel Chandra; Alok Sharma; Abdollah Dehzangi; Shoba Ranganathan; Anjeela Jokhan; Kuo-Chen Chou; Tatsuhiko Tsunoda
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  CentroidAlign-Web: A Fast and Accurate Multiple Aligner for Long Non-Coding RNAs.

Authors:  Haruka Yonemoto; Kiyoshi Asai; Michiaki Hamada
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Comprehensive prediction of lncRNA-RNA interactions in human transcriptome.

Authors:  Goro Terai; Junichi Iwakiri; Tomoshi Kameda; Michiaki Hamada; Kiyoshi Asai
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.969

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.