BACKGROUND: The environment can moderate the effect of genes - a phenomenon called gene-environment (GxE) interaction. Several studies have found that socioeconomic status (SES) modifies the heritability of children's intelligence. Among low-SES families, genetic factors have been reported to explain less of the variance in intelligence; the reverse is found for high-SES families. The evidence however is inconsistent. Other studies have reported an effect in the opposite direction (higher heritability in lower SES), or no moderation of the genetic effect on intelligence. METHODS: Using 8716 twin pairs from the Twins Early Development Study (TEDS), we attempted to replicate the reported moderating effect of SES on children's intelligence at ages 2, 3, 4, 7, 9, 10, 12 and 14: i.e., lower heritability in lower-SES families. We used a twin model that allowed for a main effect of SES on intelligence, as well as a moderating effect of SES on the genetic and environmental components of intelligence. RESULTS: We found greater variance in intelligence in low-SES families, but minimal evidence of GxE interaction across the eight ages. A power calculation indicated that a sample size of about 5000 twin pairs is required to detect moderation of the genetic component of intelligence as small as 0.25, with about 80% power - a difference of 11% to 53% in heritability, in low- (-2 standard deviations, SD) and high-SES (+2 SD) families. With samples at each age of about this size, the present study found no moderation of the genetic effect on intelligence. However, we found the greater variance in low-SES families is due to moderation of the environmental effect - an environment-environment interaction. CONCLUSIONS: In a UK-representative sample, the genetic effect on intelligence is similar in low- and high-SES families. Children's shared experiences appear to explain the greater variation in intelligence in lower SES.
BACKGROUND: The environment can moderate the effect of genes - a phenomenon called gene-environment (GxE) interaction. Several studies have found that socioeconomic status (SES) modifies the heritability of children's intelligence. Among low-SES families, genetic factors have been reported to explain less of the variance in intelligence; the reverse is found for high-SES families. The evidence however is inconsistent. Other studies have reported an effect in the opposite direction (higher heritability in lower SES), or no moderation of the genetic effect on intelligence. METHODS: Using 8716 twin pairs from the Twins Early Development Study (TEDS), we attempted to replicate the reported moderating effect of SES on children's intelligence at ages 2, 3, 4, 7, 9, 10, 12 and 14: i.e., lower heritability in lower-SES families. We used a twin model that allowed for a main effect of SES on intelligence, as well as a moderating effect of SES on the genetic and environmental components of intelligence. RESULTS: We found greater variance in intelligence in low-SES families, but minimal evidence of GxE interaction across the eight ages. A power calculation indicated that a sample size of about 5000 twin pairs is required to detect moderation of the genetic component of intelligence as small as 0.25, with about 80% power - a difference of 11% to 53% in heritability, in low- (-2 standard deviations, SD) and high-SES (+2 SD) families. With samples at each age of about this size, the present study found no moderation of the genetic effect on intelligence. However, we found the greater variance in low-SES families is due to moderation of the environmental effect - an environment-environment interaction. CONCLUSIONS: In a UK-representative sample, the genetic effect on intelligence is similar in low- and high-SES families. Children's shared experiences appear to explain the greater variation in intelligence in lower SES.
Authors: Michael D Grant; William S Kremen; Kristen C Jacobson; Carol Franz; Hong Xian; Seth A Eisen; Rosemary Toomey; Ruth E Murray; Michael J Lyons Journal: Behav Genet Date: 2010-03-19 Impact factor: 2.805
Authors: Steven Boker; Michael Neale; Hermine Maes; Michael Wilde; Michael Spiegel; Timothy Brick; Jeffrey Spies; Ryne Estabrook; Sarah Kenny; Timothy Bates; Paras Mehta; John Fox Journal: Psychometrika Date: 2011-04-01 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Sophie van der Sluis; Gonneke Willemsen; Eco J C de Geus; Dorret I Boomsma; Danielle Posthuma Journal: Behav Genet Date: 2008-06-06 Impact factor: 2.805
Authors: Rachel M Brouwer; Inge L C van Soelen; Suzanne C Swagerman; Hugo G Schnack; Erik A Ehli; René S Kahn; Hilleke E Hulshoff Pol; Dorret I Boomsma Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2013-12-31 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Jonathan M Platt; Katie A McLaughlin; Alex R Luedtke; Jennifer Ahern; Alan S Kaufman; Katherine M Keyes Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2018-07-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Tian Ge; Chia-Yen Chen; Alysa E Doyle; Richard Vettermann; Lauri J Tuominen; Daphne J Holt; Mert R Sabuncu; Jordan W Smoller Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2019-07-22 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Lindsay L Miller; Hanna C Gustafsson; Jessica Tipsord; Minkyoung Song; Elizabeth Nousen; Nathan Dieckmann; Joel T Nigg Journal: J Abnorm Child Psychol Date: 2018-07