| Literature DB >> 22312286 |
Isabela Ferrari Pereira Lima1, Juliano De Dea Lindner1,2, Vanete Thomaz Soccol3, José Luiz Parada3, Carlos Ricardo Soccol1.
Abstract
Herbal mate (Ilex paraguariensis A.St.-Hil.) leaves are traditionally used for their stimulant, antioxidant, antimicrobial, and diuretic activity, presenting as principal components polyphenolic compounds. The aim of this work was to develop an innovative, non-dairy, functional, probiotic, fermented beverage using herbal mate extract as a natural ingredient which would also be hypocholesterolemic and hepatoprotective. Among different strains used, Lactobacillus acidophilus was selected as the best for fermentation. The addition of honey positively affected the development of L. acidophilus and the formulated beverage maintained microbial stability during shelf life. Key ingredients in the extract included xanthines, polyphenols and other antioxidants with potential health benefits for the consumer. Caffeine levels and antioxidant activity were also studied. Acceptable levels of caffeine and large antioxidant capacity were observed for the formulation when compared to other antioxidant beverages. An advantage of this product is the compliance to organic claims, while providing caffeine, other phyto-stimulants and antioxidant compounds without the addition of synthetic components or preservatives in the formulation. Sensorial analysis demonstrated that the beverage had good consumer acceptance in comparison to two other similar commercial beverages. Therefore, this beverage could be used as a new, non-dairy vehicle for probiotic consumption, especially by vegetarians and lactose intolerant consumers. It is expected that such a product will have good market potential in an era of functional foods.Entities:
Keywords: Lactobacillus acidophilus; antioxidant activity; caffeine; herbal mate; probiotic beverage
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22312286 PMCID: PMC3269720 DOI: 10.3390/ijms13010788
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Formulations with different compositions of carbohydrate and nitrogen substrates.
| Formulations | Carbohydrate and nitrogen substrates (w/v) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yeast extract | Honey | Malt extract | Sugar cane molasse | |
| A | 0.5 | 4 | - | - |
| B | 0.5 | 6 | - | - |
| C | 0.5 | 8 | - | - |
| D | 0.5 | 10 | - | - |
| E | 0.5 | 4 | - | - |
| F | 1.5 | 4 | - | - |
| G | - | - | 4 | - |
| H | - | - | 6 | - |
| I | - | - | 8 | - |
| J | - | - | - | 4 |
| K | - | - | - | 6 |
| L | - | - | - | 8 |
| M | - | 10 | - | - |
| N | - | 14 | - | - |
percentage; - absent.
Figure 1Changes in pH (●), growth trends of Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 expressed as log colony-forming units (CFU) mL−1(▴) and acidity expressed as mL of 0.1 N NaOH (secondary axis—dashed line ■) during different steps of fermentation and shelf life for the herbal mate beverage.
Figure 2Sugar content (Glucose: solid line ■; Fructose: solid line ◆) and organic acids (secondary axis: Lactic acid—dashed line ▴; Acetic acid—dashed line ●) expressed as g L−1 for formulations and beverage during fermentation and shelf life.
pH and mean values obtained after duplicate assays for fermentation parameters, caffeine content and antioxidant activity of formulation during fermentation and beverage during shelf life.
| pH | Acidity | Bacterial count | Sugar | Organic acid | Caffeine | Antioxidant activity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose | Fructose | Lactic | Acetic | ||||||
| 0 h | 6.65 | 0.10 | 4.37 ± 3.12 | 40.2 | 60.2 | 0.00 | 0.00 | nd | nd |
| 2 h | 6.30 | 0.20 | 4.46 ± 2.15 | 38.7 | 59.7 | 0.68 | 0.16 | nd | nd |
| 4 h | 5.92 | 0.25 | 5.23 ± 3.94 | 36.2 | 57.9 | 1.03 | 0.32 | nd | nd |
| 6 h | 5.23 | 0.40 | 6.11 ± 4.18 | 31.5 | 54.8 | 1.13 | 0.44 | nd | nd |
| 8 h | 4.80 | 0.45 | 8.13 ± 3.24 | 30.9 | 53.1 | 1.62 | 0.47 | nd | nd |
| 10 h | 4.30 | 0.60 | 8.64 ± 5.14 | 30.5 | 52.7 | 1.79 | 0.50 | 6.56 | 58 ± 2 |
| 12 h | 3.67 | 0.70 | 7.69 ± 4.47 | 30.1 | 52.6 | 1.94 | 0.53 | nd | nd |
| 7 days | 4.12 | 0.60 | 8.14 ± 4.56 | 30.6 | 52.9 | 1.80 | 0.53 | 6.70 | 56 ± 3 |
| 14 days | 4,00 | 0.75 | 8.04 ± 2.98 | 29.8 | 51.4 | 1.87 | 0.54 | 6.82 | 55 ± 2 |
| 21 days | 3.67 | 1.15 | 7.90 ± 3.35 | 30.1 | 52.6 | 1.92 | 0.62 | 6.68 | 59 ± 2 |
| 28 days | 3.50 | 1.20 | 7.96 ± 4.16 | 30.0 | 51.2 | 2.03 | 0.69 | 6.70 | 58 ± 1 |
mL 0.1 N NaOH;
logarithmic bacterial counts expressed as log CFU mL−1 (±SD);
g L−1;
mg 100 mL−1;
% reduction DPPH (±SD), percentage inhibition defined as [(A517 blank − A517 sample) A517 blank−1] 100−1 (%); nd: not determined.
Acceptance (average values ± SD) and acceptability factors (AF) for the herbal mate beverage and commercial mate tea A and B.
| Attributes (AF) | Commercial Mate Tea A | Commercial Mate Tea B | Probiotic Mate Beverage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Color | 6.2 ± 1.4 | 6.4 ± 1.3 | 5.4 ± 1.3 |
| Transparency | 7.3 ± 1.3 | 7.0 ± 1.2 | 5.0 ± 1.2 |
| Precipitation | 7.8 ± 1.1 | 8.0 ± 1.1 | 4.9 ± 1.3 |
| Sweetness | 6.1 ± 1.4 | 6.3 ± 1.3 | 5.5 ± 1.4 |
| Acidity | 6.4 ± 1.1 | 6.6 ± 1.3 | 5.6 ± 1.0 |
| Astringency | 6.2 ± 1.7 | 6.3 ± 1.7 | 5.5 ± 1.3 |
| Saltiness | 7.1 ± 1.1 | 6.9 ± 1.0 | 5.8 ± 1.0 |
| Distasteful aftertaste | 6.4 ± 1.3 | 6.3 ± 1.5 | 6.4 ± 1.2 |
Means with the same letter in the same line are not significantly different (P < 0.05), according to ANOVA and Tukey’s test.
Variance analysis (ANOVA) for the sensorial test of beverages.
| Source of variation | Degree of freedom | Sum of squares | Mean of squares | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Color | 2 | 5.6000 | 2.8000 | 1.7571 |
| Transparency | 2 | 31.2666 | 15.6333 | 9.8106 |
| Precipitation | 2 | 60.2000 | 30.1000 | 18.8890 |
| Sweetness | 2 | 3.4666 | 1.7333 | 1.0877 |
| Acidity | 2 | 5.6000 | 2.8000 | 1.7571 |
| Astringency | 2 | 3.8000 | 1.9000 | 1.1923 |
| Saltiness | 2 | 9.8000 | 4.9000 | 3.0750 |
| Distasteful aftertaste | 2 | 0.0666 | 0.0333 | 0.0209 |
| Residue | 216 | 344.2000 | 1.5935 | |
| Total | 232 | 464.0000 | ||
1% significance (P < 0.01);
5% significance (0.01 ≤ P < 0.05);
not significant (P ≥ 0.05).
Figure 3Acceptability factors in percentage (Y axis) and attributes (X axis) for the herbal mate beverage (black bar) and commercial mate tea A (dark grey bar) and B (pale grey bar).