Literature DB >> 22312168

Poor outcomes at discharge among extremely premature infants: a national population-based study.

Amir Kugelman1, David Bader, Liat Lerner-Geva, Valentina Boyko, Orna Levitzki, Arieh Riskin, Brian Reichman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess risk factors and develop a simple estimate method for poor neonatal outcomes for specific groups of extremely premature infants at birth.
DESIGN: Population-based study.
SETTING: Israel National Very Low Birth Weight Infant Database. PARTICIPANTS: Infants born at 23 to 26 weeks' gestation between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 2008. INTERVENTION: We developed a tool to estimate poor neonatal outcomes for infants born at 24 to 26 weeks' gestation (n=2544) that incorporated factors at birth significantly associated with poor outcomes into a linear regression model. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Poor neonatal outcomes defined as the composite of mortality or severe neurologic or pulmonary morbidity at discharge from the hospital.
RESULTS: Major factors associated with poor outcomes at 24 to 26 weeks' gestation were gestational age, male sex, sex-specific birth weight percentile, and lack of prenatal steroid therapy. Estimated poor outcomes for January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2008, were calculated as the sum of the percentages determined for each of the 4 parameters: (1) gestational age (26, 25, and 24 weeks; 0%, 17%, and 34%, respectively), (2) birth weight percentile (>75th, 25th-75th, and < 25th percentiles; 0%,13%, and 26%, respectively), (3) lack of prenatal steroids (16%), and (4) male sex (7%). There was also an intercept value of 25%. Estimated poor outcome rates for the 36 subgroups of infants ranged from 25% to 100%and correlated well with observed rates (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.93).
CONCLUSIONS: The combined outcomes of deaths or severe morbidities in the neonatal period of infants born at 24 to 26 weeks' gestation could be simply estimated at birth. The provision of an appropriate and up-to-date estimate of poor neonatal outcomes for specific infants may be useful in counseling families on treatment options for these infants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22312168     DOI: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med        ISSN: 1072-4710


  6 in total

1.  A Plea for the traditional family: Situating marriage within John Paul II's realist, or personalist, perspective of human freedom.

Authors:  Michele M Schumacher
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2014-11

2.  Neonatal outcome of extremely preterm Asian infants ⩽28 weeks over a decade in the new millennium.

Authors:  P Agarwal; B Sriram; V S Rajadurai
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 2.521

3.  Decision-making at the borderline of viability: Who should decide and on what basis?

Authors:  Lynn Gillam; Dominic Wilkinson; Vicki Xafis; David Isaacs
Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.954

4.  The Prognosis of Preterm Infants Born at the Threshold of Viability: Fog Over the Gray Zone - Population-Based Studies of Extremely Preterm Infants.

Authors:  Eszter Fanczal; Botond Berecz; Annamária Szijártó; Ákos Gasparics; Péter Varga
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-12-10

5.  Risk Factors for Cause-specific Mortality of Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants in the Korean Neonatal Network.

Authors:  Jae Woo Lim; Sung-Hoon Chung; Dae Ryong Kang; Chang-Ryul Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Prediction of outcomes of extremely low gestational age newborns in Australia and New Zealand.

Authors:  Kee Thai Yeo; Nadom Safi; Yueping Alex Wang; Renate Le Marsney; Timothy Schindler; Srinivas Bolisetty; Ross Haslam; Kei Lui
Journal:  BMJ Paediatr Open       Date:  2017-11-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.