Literature DB >> 22311733

Diastolic tolerance to systolic pressures closely reflects systolic performance in patients with coronary heart disease.

Adelino F Leite-Moreira1, André P Lourenço, Roberto Roncon-Albuquerque, Tiago Henriques-Coelho, Mário J Amorim, Jorge Almeida, Paulo Pinho, Thierry C Gillebert.   

Abstract

In animal experiments, elevating systolic pressures induces diastolic dysfunction and may contribute to congestion, a finding not yet translated to humans. Coronary surgery patients (63 ± 8 years) were studied with left ventricular (LV) pressure (n = 17) or pressure-volume (n = 3) catheters, immediately before cardiopulmonary bypass. Single-beat graded pressure elevations were induced by clamping the ascending aorta. Protocol was repeated after volume loading (n = 7). Consecutive patients with a wide range of systolic function were included. Peak isovolumetric LV pressure (LVP(iso)) ranged from 113 to 261 mmHg. With preserved systolic function, LVP elevations neither delayed relaxation nor increased filling pressures. With decreasing systolic function, diastolic tolerance to afterload progressively disappeared: relaxation slowed and filling pressures increased (diastolic dysfunction). In severely depressed systolic function, filling pressures increased even with minor LVP elevations, suggesting baseline load-dependent elevation of diastolic pressures. The magnitude of filling pressure elevation induced in isovolumetric heartbeats was closely and inversely related to systolic performance, evaluated by LVP(iso) (r = -0.96), and directly related to changes in the time constant of relaxation τ (r = 0.95). The maximum tolerated systolic LVP (without diastolic dysfunction) was similarly correlated with LVP(iso) (r = 0.99). Volume loading itself accelerated relaxation, but augmented afterload-induced upward shift of filling pressures (7.9 ± 3.7 vs. 3.0 ± 1.5; P < 0.01). The normal human response to even markedly increased systolic pressures is no slowing of relaxation and preservation of normal filling pressures. When cardiac function deteriorates, the LV becomes less tolerant, responding with slowed relaxation and increased filling pressures. This increase is exacerbated by volume loading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22311733     DOI: 10.1007/s00395-012-0251-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol        ISSN: 0300-8428            Impact factor:   17.165


  10 in total

Review 1.  The pathophysiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Barry A Borlaug
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  E/e' Ratio in Patients With Unexplained Dyspnea: Lack of Accuracy in Estimating Left Ventricular Filling Pressure.

Authors:  Mário Santos; Jose Rivero; Shane D McCullough; Erin West; Alexander R Opotowsky; Aaron B Waxman; David M Systrom; Amil M Shah
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 8.790

3.  Late Systolic Myocardial Loading Is Associated With Left Atrial Dysfunction in Hypertension.

Authors:  Julio A Chirinos; Timothy S Phan; Amer A Syed; Zeba Hashmath; Harry G Oldland; Maheswara R Koppula; Ali Tariq; Khuzaima Javaid; Rachana Miller; Swapna Varakantam; Anjaneyulu Dunde; Vadde Neetha; Scott R Akers
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 7.792

4.  Impaired left ventricular function in the presence of preserved ejection in chronic hypertensive conscious pigs.

Authors:  Mario Rienzo; Alain Bizé; Dionyssis Pongas; Stéphanie Michineau; Jonathan Melka; Hon Lai Chan; Lucien Sambin; Jin Bo Su; Jean-Luc Dubois-Randé; Luc Hittinger; Alain Berdeaux; Bijan Ghaleh
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  2012-09-09       Impact factor: 17.165

5.  Wave propagation of myocardial stretch: correlation with myocardial stiffness.

Authors:  Cristina Pislaru; Patricia A Pellikka; Sorin V Pislaru
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 17.165

6.  A randomized pilot study of aortic waveform guided therapy in chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Barry A Borlaug; Thomas P Olson; Sahar S Abdelmoneim; Sahar Abdelmoneim Mohamed; Vojtech Melenovsky; Vincent L Sorrell; Kelly Noonan; Grace Lin; Margaret M Redfield
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 5.501

7.  Reduced First-Phase Ejection Fraction and Sustained Myocardial Wall Stress in Hypertensive Patients With Diastolic Dysfunction: A Manifestation of Impaired Shortening Deactivation That Links Systolic to Diastolic Dysfunction and Preserves Systolic Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Haotian Gu; Ye Li; Henry Fok; John Simpson; Jonathan C Kentish; Ajay M Shah; Philip J Chowienczyk
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 10.190

8.  Early myocardial damage (EMD) and valvular insufficiency result in impaired cardiac function after multiple trauma in pigs.

Authors:  Birte Weber; Ina Lackner; Meike Baur; Florian Gebhard; Roman Pfeifer; Paolo Cinelli; Sascha Halvachizadeh; Michel Teuben; Hans-Christoph Pape; Armin Imhof; Miriam Lipiski; Nikola Cesarovic; Miriam Kalbitz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Early myocardial damage (EMD) and valvular dysfunction after femur fracture in pigs.

Authors:  Birte Weber; Ina Lackner; Theodore Miclau; Jonathan Stulz; Florian Gebhard; Roman Pfeifer; Paolo Cinelli; Sascha Halvachizadeh; Michel Teuben; Hans-Christoph Pape; Miriam Lipiski; Nikola Cesarovic; Miriam Kalbitz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in type 2 diabetes mellitus: from pathophysiology to therapeutics.

Authors:  Miyesaier Abudureyimu; Xuanming Luo; Xiang Wang; James R Sowers; Wenshuo Wang; Junbo Ge; Jun Ren; Yingmei Zhang
Journal:  J Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 8.185

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.