Literature DB >> 22311559

Comparison of stochastic and deterministic methods for mapping groundwater level spatial variability in sparsely monitored basins.

Epsilon A Varouchakis1, D T Hristopulos.   

Abstract

In sparsely monitored basins, accurate mapping of the spatial variability of groundwater level requires the interpolation of scattered data. This paper presents a comparison of deterministic interpolation methods, i.e. inverse distance weight (IDW) and minimum curvature (MC), with stochastic methods, i.e. ordinary kriging (OK), universal kriging (UK) and kriging with Delaunay triangulation (DK). The study area is the Mires Basin of Mesara Valley in Crete (Greece). This sparsely sampled basin has limited groundwater resources which are vital for the island's economy; spatial variations of the groundwater level are important for developing management and monitoring strategies. We evaluate the performance of the interpolation methods with respect to different statistical measures. The Spartan variogram family is applied for the first time to hydrological data and is shown to be optimal with respect to stochastic interpolation of this dataset. The three stochastic methods (OK, DK and UK) perform overall better than the deterministic counterparts (IDW and MC). DK, which is herein for the first time applied to hydrological data, yields the most accurate cross-validation estimate for the lowest value in the dataset. OK and UK lead to smooth isolevel contours, whilst DK and IDW generate more edges. The stochastic methods deliver estimates of prediction uncertainty which becomes highest near the southeastern border of the basin.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22311559     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-012-2527-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  7 in total

1.  Kriging water levels with a regional-linear and point-logarithmic drift.

Authors:  Matthew J Tonkin; Steven P Larson
Journal:  Ground Water       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.671

2.  Application and evaluation of kriging and cokriging methods on groundwater depth mapping.

Authors:  Seyed Hamid Ahmadi; Abbas Sedghamiz
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Estimating oil spill characteristics from oil heads in scattered monitoring wells.

Authors:  R Cooke; S Mostaghimi; J C Parker
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Groundwater depth and elevation interpolation by kriging methods in Mohr Basin of Fars province in Iran.

Authors:  Leila Nikroo; Mazda Kompani-Zare; Ali Reza Sepaskhah; Seyed Rashid Fallah Shamsi
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Mapping water table depth using geophysical and environmental variables.

Authors:  S Buchanan; J Triantafilis
Journal:  Ground Water       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 2.671

6.  Spatial variability of groundwater depth and quality parameters in the National Capital Territory of Delhi.

Authors:  J P Dash; A Sarangi; D K Singh
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.266

7.  Geostatistical analysis of spatial and temporal variations of groundwater level.

Authors:  Seyed Hamid Ahmadi; Abbas Sedghamiz
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2006-12-16       Impact factor: 3.307

  7 in total
  10 in total

1.  Geostatistics-based groundwater-level monitoring network design and its application to the Upper Floridan aquifer, USA.

Authors:  Shirish Bhat; Louis H Motz; Chandra Pathak; Laura Kuebler
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Estimation of spatial distribution of heavy metals in groundwater using interpolation methods and multivariate statistical techniques; its suitability for drinking and irrigation purposes in the Middle Black Sea Region of Turkey.

Authors:  Hakan Arslan; Nazlı Ayyildiz Turan
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Geostatistical analysis of precipitation in the island of Crete (Greece) based on a sparse monitoring network.

Authors:  Vasiliki D Agou; Emmanouil A Varouchakis; Dionissios T Hristopulos
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  A Bayesian maximum entropy-based methodology for optimal spatiotemporal design of groundwater monitoring networks.

Authors:  Marjan Hosseini; Reza Kerachian
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  The geostatistic-based spatial distribution variations of soil salts under long-term wastewater irrigation.

Authors:  Wenyong Wu; Shiyang Yin; Honglu Liu; Yong Niu; Zhe Bao
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Does irrigation with reclaimed water significantly pollute shallow aquifer with nitrate and salinity? An assay in a perurban area in North Tunisia.

Authors:  Makram Anane; Youssef Selmi; Atef Limam; Naceur Jedidi; Salah Jellali
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  Estimation of spatial distrubition of groundwater level and risky areas of seawater intrusion on the coastal region in Çarşamba Plain, Turkey, using different interpolation methods.

Authors:  Hakan Arslan
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Investigation of landslide detection using radial basis functions: a case study of the Taşkent landslide, Turkey.

Authors:  Mustafa Zeybek; İsmail Şanlıoğlu
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 2.513

9.  Surrogate Model Application to the Identification of Optimal Groundwater Exploitation Scheme Based on Regression Kriging Method-A Case Study of Western Jilin Province.

Authors:  Yongkai An; Wenxi Lu; Weiguo Cheng
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Digital soil mapping in the Bara district of Nepal using kriging tool in ArcGIS.

Authors:  Dinesh Panday; Bijesh Maharjan; Devraj Chalise; Ram Kumar Shrestha; Bikesh Twanabasu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.