Literature DB >> 22311253

Intermittency in processing explains the diversity and shape of functional grazing responses.

Kai W Wirtz1.   

Abstract

Central to theoretical studies of trophic interactions is the formulation of the consumer response to varying food availability. Response functions, however, are only rarely derived in mechanistic ways. As a consequence, the uncertainty in the functional representation of feeding remains large, as, e.g., evident from the ongoing debate on the usage of Ivlev, or Holling type I, II, and III functions in aquatic ecosystem models. Here, I refer to the work of Sjöberg in Ecol Model 10:215-225 (1980) who proposed to apply elements of the queuing theory developed in operational research to plankton-plankton interactions. Within this frame, food item processing is subdivided into two major stages which may operate with variable synchronicity. Asynchronous phasing of the two stages enhances the probability of long total processing times. This phenomenon is here termed feeding intermittency. Intermittency is assumed to determine the functional form of grazing kinetics, for which a novel grazing function containing a "shape" parameter is derived. Using this function, I evaluate the hypotheses that intermittency is influenced by (1) patchiness in the prey field (e.g., related to turbulence), and (2) the ratio of actual prey size to optimal prey size. Evidence for the first hypothesis arises from explaining reported variations in clearance rates of Acartia tonsa under different turbulence regimes. Further model applications to ingestion data for rotifers, copepods, and ciliates support the view that an increasing food size enhances intermittency and, this way, affects functional grazing responses. In the application to ciliate grazing, a possible prey density effect appears, possibly due to an intermittent activation of a feeding sub-stage. Queueing theory offers mechanistic explanations for transitions between Holling I-, II-, and Ivlev-type grazing. In doing so for variable prey size ratios, it may also refine size-based ecosystem models which are increasingly emerging in plankton ecology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22311253     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-012-2257-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  11 in total

1.  Effects of spatial grouping on the functional response of predators.

Authors:  C Cosner; D L DeAngelis; J S Ault; D B Olson
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.570

2.  Complexity, contingency, and criticality.

Authors:  P Bak; M Paczuski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-07-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Social welfare as a variable in population dynamics.

Authors:  J B CALHOUN
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1957

Review 4.  Consumer-food systems: why type I functional responses are exclusive to filter feeders.

Authors:  Jonathan M Jeschke; Michael Kopp; Ralph Tollrian
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2004-05

5.  Plankton motility patterns and encounter rates.

Authors:  André W Visser; Thomas Kiørboe
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Functional responses modified by predator density.

Authors:  Pavel Kratina; Matthijs Vos; Andrew Bateman; Bradley R Anholt
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Towards a correct description of zooplankton feeding in models: taking into account food-mediated unsynchronized vertical migration.

Authors:  A Yu Morozov; E G Arashkevich
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Feeding in the rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus : I. Regulatory Mechanisms.

Authors:  John J Gilbert; Peter L Starkweather
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Stability in simple grazing models: effects of explicit functions.

Authors:  I Noy-Meir
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1978-04-06       Impact factor: 2.691

10.  Grazing in a turbulent environment: behavioral response of a calanoid copepod, Centropages hamatus.

Authors:  J H Costello; J R Strickler; C Marrasé; G Trager; R Zeller; A J Freise
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.