Literature DB >> 22310997

A clinical analysis on microvascular decompression surgery in a series of 3000 cases.

Jun Zhong1, Shi-Ting Li, Jin Zhu, Hong-Xin Guan, Qiu-Meng Zhou, Wei Jiao, Ting-Ting Ying, Xiao-Sheng Yang, Wen-Chuang Zhan, Xu-Ming Hua.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Despite the microvascular decompression (MVD) has become a definitive treatment for trigeminal neuralgia (TN) and hemifacial spasm (HFS), not all of the patients have been cured completely so far and this sort of operation is still with risk because of the critical operative area. In order to refine this surgery, we investigated thousands MVDs.
METHODS: Among 3000 consecutive cases of MVDs have been performed in our department, 2601 were those with typical TN or HFS, who were then enrolled in this investigation. They were retrospectively analyzed with emphasis on the correlation between surgical findings and postoperative outcomes. The differences between TN and HFS cases were compared. The strategy of each surgical process of MVD was addressed.
RESULTS: Postoperatively, the pain free or spasm cease occurred immediately in 88.3%. The symptoms improved at some degree in 7.2%. The symptoms unimproved at all in 4.5%. Most of those with poor outcome underwent a redo MVD in the following days. Eventually, their symptoms were then improved in 98.7% of the reoperative patients. The majority reason of the failed surgery was that the neurovascular conflict located beyond REZ or the offending veins were missed for TN, while the exact offending artery (arteriole) was missed for HFS as it located far more medially than expected.
CONCLUSION: A prompt recognition of the conflict site leads to a successful MVD. To facilitate the approach, the craniotomy should be lateral enough to the sigmoid sinus. The whole intracranial nerve root should be examined and veins or arterioles should not be ignored. For TN, all the vessels contacting the nerve should be detached. For HFS, the exposure should be medial enough to the pontomedullary sulcus.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22310997     DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.01.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg        ISSN: 0303-8467            Impact factor:   1.876


  18 in total

1.  Microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: focus on late reoperation.

Authors:  Xuhui Wang; Parthasarathy D Thirumala; Aalap Shah; Paul Gardner; Miguel Habeych; Donald Crammond; Jeffrey Balzer; Lois Burkhart; Michael Horowitz
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  MRI findings in patients with a history of failed prior microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: how to image and where to look.

Authors:  M A Hughes; B F Branstetter; C T Taylor; S Fakhran; W T Delfyett; A M Frederickson; R F Sekula
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Fatal complications following microvascular decompression: could it be avoided and salvaged?

Authors:  Lei Xia; Ming-Xing Liu; Jun Zhong; Ning-Ning Dou; Bin Li; Hui Sun; Shi-Ting Li
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  A retrospective study of neurocombing for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia without neurovascular compression.

Authors:  X Liang; X Dong; S Zhao; X Ying; Y Du; W Yu
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Vascular Contact of the Facial Nerve in the Asymptomatic Patient.

Authors:  Nicholas L Deep; Geoffrey P Fletcher; Kent D Nelson; Ameet C Patel; David M Barrs; Bernard R Bendok; Joseph M Hoxworth
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2016-05-27

6.  Management of symptomatic hemifacial spasm or trigeminal neuralgia.

Authors:  Ming-Xing Liu; Jun Zhong; Ning-Ning Dou; Lei Xia; Bin Li; Shi-Ting Li
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 3.042

7.  Prevention of Superior Petrosal Vein Injury during Microvascular Decompression for Trigeminal Neuralgia: Operative Nuances.

Authors:  Minsoo Kim; Sang-Ku Park; Seunghoon Lee; Jeong-A Lee; Kwan Park
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-03-01

8.  Reoperation for residual or recurrent hemifacial spasm after microvascular decompression.

Authors:  Shize Jiang; Liqin Lang; Bing Sun; Juanjuan He; Jiajun Cai; Liang Chen; Jie Hu; Ying Mao
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 2.816

Review 9.  Teflon™ or Ivalon®: a scoping review of implants used in microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia.

Authors:  Elliot Pressman; R Tushar Jha; Gleb Zavadskiy; Jay I Kumar; Harry van Loveren; Jamie J van Gompel; Siviero Agazzi
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2019-11-30       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 10.  Treatment of Blepharospasm/Hemifacial Spasm.

Authors:  Kemar E Green; David Rastall; Eric Eggenberger
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2017-09-30       Impact factor: 3.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.