Literature DB >> 22310752

Renal function after partial nephrectomy: effect of warm ischemia relative to quantity and quality of preserved kidney.

R Houston Thompson1, Brian R Lane, Christine M Lohse, Bradley C Leibovich, Amr Fergany, Igor Frank, Inderbir S Gill, Michael L Blute, Steven C Campbell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of warm ischemia time (WIT) and quantity and quality of kidney preserved on renal functional recovery after partial nephrectomy (PN). The effect of WIT relative to these other parameters has recently been challenged.
METHODS: We identified 362 consecutive patients with a solitary kidney who had undergone PN using warm ischemia. Multivariate models with multiple imputations were used to evaluate the associations with acute renal failure and new-onset stage IV chronic kidney disease (CKD).
RESULTS: The median WIT was 21 minutes (range 4-55), the median percentage of kidney preserved was 80% (range 25%-98%), and the median preoperative glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was 61 mL/min/1.73 m2 (range 11-133). Postoperative acute renal failure occurred in 70 patients (19%). Of the 226 patients with a preoperative GFR>30 mL/min/1.73 m2, 38 (17%) developed new-onset stage IV CKD during follow-up. On multivariate analysis, the WIT (P=.021), percentage of kidney preserved (P=.009), and preoperative GFR (P<.001) were significantly associated with acute renal failure, and only the percentage of kidney preserved (P<.001) and preoperative GFR (P<.001) were significantly associated with new-onset stage IV CKD during follow-up. Using our previously published cutpoint of 25 minutes, a WIT of >25 minutes remained significantly associated with new-onset stage IV CKD in a multivariate analysis adjusting for the quantity and quality factors (hazard ratio 2.27, P=.049).
CONCLUSION: Our results have validated that the quality and quantity of kidney are the most important determinants of renal function after PN. In addition, we have also demonstrated that the WIT remains an important modifiable feature associated with short- and long-term renal function. The precision of surgery, maximizing the amount of preserved, vascularized parenchyma, should be a focus of study for optimizing the PN procedure.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22310752     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.10.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  69 in total

1.  Partial nephrectomy driven by cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator under zero ischemia: a pilot study.

Authors:  Peter Weibl; Shahrokh F Shariat; Tobias Klatte
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-05-03       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Responses: Re: Csaba Berczi, Ben Thomas, Zsolt Bacso, Tibor Flasko. Bilateral renal cancers: oncological and functional outcomes. Int Urol Nephrol 2016 (Epub ahead of print).

Authors:  Csaba Berczi
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 3.  Zero ischaemia partial nephrectomy: a call for standardized nomenclature and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Ahmad Alenezi; Giacomo Novara; Alexander Mottrie; Salah Al-Buheissi; Omer Karim
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Re: Csaba Berczi, Ben Thomas, Zsolt Bacso, Tibor Flasko. Bilateral renal cancers: oncological and functional outcomes. Int Urol Nephrol 2016 (Epub ahead of print).

Authors:  Matthew J Watson; Abhinav Sidana; Eric A Singer; Gopal N Gupta; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Srinivas Vourganti; Gennady Bratslavsky; Adam R Metwalli
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 5.  Renal Function Following Nephron Sparing Procedures: Simply a Matter of Volume?

Authors:  Michael J Biles; G Joel DeCastro; Solomon L Woldu
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Open versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for clinical T1a renal masses: a matched-pair comparison of 280 patients with TRIFECTA outcomes (RECORd Project).

Authors:  Andrea Minervini; Giampaolo Siena; Alessandro Antonelli; Giampaolo Bianchi; Aldo Massimo Bocciardi; Sergio Cosciani Cunico; Vincenzo Ficarra; Cristian Fiori; Ferdinando Fusco; Andrea Mari; Giuseppe Martorana; Mauro Medica; Vincenzo Mirone; Giuseppe Morgia; Francesco Porpiglia; Francesco Rocco; Bruno Rovereto; Riccardo Schiavina; Claudio Simeone; Carlo Terrone; Alessandro Volpe; Marco Carini; Sergio Serni
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Are warm ischemia and ischemia time still predictive factors of poor renal function after partial nephrectomy in the setting of elective indication?

Authors:  Thomas Bessede; Pierre Bigot; Jean-Christophe Bernhard; Geraldine Pignot; Fabien Boulière; Gregory Verhoest; Maxime Crépel; Laurent Salomon; Nicolas Mottet; Laurent Bellec; Michel Soulié; Jean-Marie Ferrière; Christian Pfister; Baptiste Albouy; Frederic Pouliot; Thierry Dujardin; Karim Bensalah; Jean-Jacques Patard
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Multidetector computed tomography angiography of the renal arteries: normal anatomy and its variations.

Authors:  Carlos Fernando de Mello Júnior; Severino Aires Araujo Neto; Arlindo Monteiro de Carvalho Junior; Rafael Batista Rebouças; Gustavo Ramalho Pessoa Negromonte; Carollyne Dantas de Oliveira
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2016 May-Jun

9.  Nephron sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma up to 7 cm in the context of guideline development: a contribution of healthcare research.

Authors:  Steffen Lebentrau; Sven Rauter; Daniel Baumunk; Frank Christoph; Frank König; Matthias May; Martin Schostak
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 10.  Partial nephrectomy--contemporary indications, techniques and outcomes.

Authors:  Scott Leslie; Alvin C Goh; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.