Literature DB >> 2231057

Evaluating the evidence for the effectiveness of prevention.

L Gordis1.   

Abstract

This report reviews a number of issues that should be considered in evaluating the evidence for the effectiveness of primary and secondary prevention. In evaluating primary prevention, changes in disease incidence are the ideal index but mortality may also be a useful surrogate in certain cases. Both relative risk and attributable risk are valuable concepts in evaluating the benefits of primary prevention. In evaluating screening, the most notable approach to secondary prevention, certain potential biases should be taken into account. These include selection biases due to referral or length-biased sampling, lead time bias, and overdiagnosis bias. An understanding of the methodologic issues involved in evaluating prevention will help ensure the validity of any conclusions drawn regarding the effectiveness of preventive measures and programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2231057     DOI: 10.1007/bf02600833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  1 in total

1.  The periodic health examination. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1979-11-03       Impact factor: 8.262

  1 in total
  2 in total

1.  Applying the quit & win contest model in the Vietnamese community in Santa Clara county.

Authors:  K Q Lai; S J McPhee; C N Jenkins; C Wong
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Early impact and performance characteristics of an established anal dysplasia screening program: program evaluation considerations.

Authors:  Christopher Mathews; Joseph Caperna; Edward R Cachay; Bard Cosman
Journal:  Open AIDS J       Date:  2007-11-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.