BACKGROUND: Recent research from a complexity theory perspective suggests that implementation of complex models of care, such as the Chronic Care Model (CCM), requires strong relationships and learning capacities among primary care teams. PURPOSES: Our primary aim was to assess the extent to which practice member perceptions of relational coordination and reciprocal learning were associated with the presence of CCM elements in community-based primary care practices. METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: We used baseline measures from a cluster randomized controlled trial testing a practice facilitation intervention to implement the CCM and improve risk factor control for patients with Type 2 diabetes in small primary care practices. Practice members (i.e., physicians, nonphysician providers, and staff) completed baseline assessments, which included the Relational Coordination Scale, Reciprocal Learning Scale, and the Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (ACIC) survey, along with items assessing individual and clinic characteristics. To assess the association between Relational Coordination, Reciprocal Learning, and ACIC, we used a series of hierarchical linear regression models accounting for clustering of individual practice members within clinics and controlling for individual- and practice-level characteristics and tested for mediation effects. FINDINGS: A total of 283 practice members from 39 clinics completed baseline measures. Relational Coordination scores were significantly and positively associated with ACIC scores (Model 1). When Reciprocal Learning was added, Relational Coordination remained a significant yet notably attenuated predictor of ACIC (Model 2). The mediation effect was significant (z = 9.3, p < .01); 24% of the association between Relational Coordination and ACIC scores was explained by Reciprocal Learning. Of the individual- and practice-level covariates included in Model 3, only the presence of an electronic medical record was significant; Relational Coordination and Reciprocal Learning remained significant independent predictors of ACIC. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Efforts to implement complex models of care should incorporate strategies to strengthen relational coordination and reciprocal learning among team members.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Recent research from a complexity theory perspective suggests that implementation of complex models of care, such as the Chronic Care Model (CCM), requires strong relationships and learning capacities among primary care teams. PURPOSES: Our primary aim was to assess the extent to which practice member perceptions of relational coordination and reciprocal learning were associated with the presence of CCM elements in community-based primary care practices. METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: We used baseline measures from a cluster randomized controlled trial testing a practice facilitation intervention to implement the CCM and improve risk factor control for patients with Type 2 diabetes in small primary care practices. Practice members (i.e., physicians, nonphysician providers, and staff) completed baseline assessments, which included the Relational Coordination Scale, Reciprocal Learning Scale, and the Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (ACIC) survey, along with items assessing individual and clinic characteristics. To assess the association between Relational Coordination, Reciprocal Learning, and ACIC, we used a series of hierarchical linear regression models accounting for clustering of individual practice members within clinics and controlling for individual- and practice-level characteristics and tested for mediation effects. FINDINGS: A total of 283 practice members from 39 clinics completed baseline measures. Relational Coordination scores were significantly and positively associated with ACIC scores (Model 1). When Reciprocal Learning was added, Relational Coordination remained a significant yet notably attenuated predictor of ACIC (Model 2). The mediation effect was significant (z = 9.3, p < .01); 24% of the association between Relational Coordination and ACIC scores was explained by Reciprocal Learning. Of the individual- and practice-level covariates included in Model 3, only the presence of an electronic medical record was significant; Relational Coordination and Reciprocal Learning remained significant independent predictors of ACIC. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Efforts to implement complex models of care should incorporate strategies to strengthen relational coordination and reciprocal learning among team members.
Authors: J H Gittell; K M Fairfield; B Bierbaum; W Head; R Jackson; M Kelly; R Laskin; S Lipson; J Siliski; T Thornhill; J Zuckerman Journal: Med Care Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Benjamin F Crabtree; Paul A Nutting; William L Miller; Reuben R McDaniel; Kurt C Stange; Carlos Roberto Jaen; Elizabeth Stewart Journal: Med Care Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Holly J Lanham; Reuben R McDaniel; Benjamin F Crabtree; William L Miller; Kurt C Stange; Alfred F Tallia; Paula Nutting Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Date: 2009-09
Authors: Luci K Leykum; Ray Palmer; Holly Lanham; Michelle Jordan; Reuben R McDaniel; Polly H Noël; Michael Parchman Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2011-02-23 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Michelle E Jordan; Holly J Lanham; Benjamin F Crabtree; Paul A Nutting; William L Miller; Kurt C Stange; Reuben R McDaniel Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2009-03-13 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Kasey R Boehmer; Nicole M Guerton; Jason Soyring; Ian Hargraves; Sara Dick; Victor M Montori Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Joseph Mignogna; Natalie E Hundt; Michael R Kauth; Mark E Kunik; Kristen H Sorocco; Aanand D Naik; Melinda A Stanley; Kaki M York; Jeffrey A Cully Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Marlon P Mundt; Valerie J Gilchrist; Michael F Fleming; Larissa I Zakletskaia; Wen-Jan Tuan; John W Beasley Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Ekaterina Anderson; Renda Soylemez Wiener; Kirsten Resnick; A Rani Elwy; Seppo T Rinne Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: David C Mohr; Justin K Benzer; Varsha G Vimalananda; Sara J Singer; Mark Meterko; Nathalie McIntosh; Kimberly L L Harvey; Marjorie Nealon Seibert; Martin P Charns Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Zhehui Luo; Qiaoling Chen; Ann M Annis; Gretchen Piatt; Lee A Green; Min Tao; Jodi Summers Holtrop Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-03-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Caroline S Blaum; Jonathan Rosen; Aanand D Naik; Cynthia D Smith; Lilian Dindo; Lauren Vo; Kizzy Hernandez-Bigos; Jessica Esterson; Mary Geda; Rosie Ferris; Darce Costello; Denise Acampora; Thomas Meehan; Mary E Tinetti Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-10-03 Impact factor: 5.562