BACKGROUND: Trauma centers nationwide have been experiencing an increase in their elderly trauma patients because of an ever growing elderly population within the United States. Many studies have demonstrated the physiologic differences between an older trauma patient versus a younger trauma patient. Coupling these differences with their coexisting medical comorbidities, makes caring for this population extremely challenging. To meet these challenges, we organized a geriatric trauma unit specifically designed with a multidisciplinary approach to take a more aggressive stance to the care of the geriatric trauma patient. METHODS: We created a geriatric trauma unit at our Level II trauma facility, called the G-60 unit. This unit opened for admission in August 2009. Inclusion criteria included all trauma patients older than 60 years. Data were abstracted from our G-60 unit from the period of August 2009 to July 2010. We compared these data to a similar patient population (control group) from January 2008 to December 2008. RESULTS: Our Trauma Data Bank yielded 673 patients for the above queried time period. The G-60 group contained 393 patients, while the control group had 280 patients. A decrease was seen among the G-60 group in all categories: average emergency department length of stay (LOS), average emergency department to operating room time, average surgical intensive care unit LOS, and average hospital LOS. A 3.8% mortality rate was found in the G-60 group compared with a 5.7% mortality rate in the control group. Our analysis also showed rate of 0% pneumonia, 1.3% respiratory failure, and 1.5% urinary tract infection in the G-6O group, while the control group had a rate of 1.8% pneumonia, 6.8% respiratory failure, and 3.9% urinary tract infection. CONCLUSION: Our data from the 1-year experience of our G-60 unit show that addressing the specific needs of elderly trauma patients will lead to better outcomes.
BACKGROUND:Trauma centers nationwide have been experiencing an increase in their elderly traumapatients because of an ever growing elderly population within the United States. Many studies have demonstrated the physiologic differences between an older traumapatient versus a younger traumapatient. Coupling these differences with their coexisting medical comorbidities, makes caring for this population extremely challenging. To meet these challenges, we organized a geriatric trauma unit specifically designed with a multidisciplinary approach to take a more aggressive stance to the care of the geriatric traumapatient. METHODS: We created a geriatric trauma unit at our Level II trauma facility, called the G-60 unit. This unit opened for admission in August 2009. Inclusion criteria included all traumapatients older than 60 years. Data were abstracted from our G-60 unit from the period of August 2009 to July 2010. We compared these data to a similar patient population (control group) from January 2008 to December 2008. RESULTS: Our Trauma Data Bank yielded 673 patients for the above queried time period. The G-60 group contained 393 patients, while the control group had 280 patients. A decrease was seen among the G-60 group in all categories: average emergency department length of stay (LOS), average emergency department to operating room time, average surgical intensive care unit LOS, and average hospital LOS. A 3.8% mortality rate was found in the G-60 group compared with a 5.7% mortality rate in the control group. Our analysis also showed rate of 0% pneumonia, 1.3% respiratory failure, and 1.5% urinary tract infection in the G-6O group, while the control group had a rate of 1.8% pneumonia, 6.8% respiratory failure, and 3.9% urinary tract infection. CONCLUSION: Our data from the 1-year experience of our G-60 unit show that addressing the specific needs of elderly traumapatients will lead to better outcomes.
Authors: Rosemary A Kozar; Saman Arbabi; Deborah M Stein; Steven R Shackford; Robert D Barraco; Walter L Biffl; Karen J Brasel; Zara Cooper; Samir M Fakhry; David Livingston; Frederick Moore; Fred Luchette Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Blessing T Oyeniyi; Erin E Fox; Michelle Scerbo; Jeffrey S Tomasek; Charles E Wade; John B Holcomb Journal: Injury Date: 2016-11-03 Impact factor: 2.586
Authors: A Vilches-Moraga; J Fox; A Paracha; A Gomez-Quintanilla; J Epstein; L Pearce Journal: Ann R Coll Surg Engl Date: 2018-06-18 Impact factor: 1.891
Authors: Zara Cooper; Susan L Mitchell; Stuart Lipsitz; Mitchel B Harris; John Z Ayanian; Rachelle E Bernacki; Ashish K Jha Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2015-10-12 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Gabrielle E Hatton; Heather R Kregel; Claudia Pedroza; Thaddeus J Puzio; Sasha D Adams; Charles E Wade; Lillian S Kao; John A Harvin Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2021-10-01 Impact factor: 13.787
Authors: Thomas R Wojda; Kristine Cornejo; Pamela L Valenza; Gregory Carolan; Richard P Sharpe; Alaa-Eldin A Mira; Sagar C Galwankar; Stanislaw Peter Stawicki Journal: J Emerg Trauma Shock Date: 2016 Jul-Sep