Anne E Münster Halvari1, Hallgeir Halvari2, Gunnar Bjørnebekk3, Edward L Deci4. 1. Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Dental Hygienist Education, University of Oslo. 2. School of Business and Social Sciences, Buskerud University College. 3. The Norwegian Centre for Child Behavioral Development. 4. Department of Clinical and Social Sciences in Psychology, University of Rochester.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The present study tested the hypotheses that: (a) a dental intervention designed to promote dental care competence in an autonomy-supportive way, relative to standard care, would positively predict perceived clinician autonomy support and patient autonomous motivation for the project, increases in autonomous motivation for dental home care, perceived dental competence, and dental behaviors, and decreases in both dental plaque and gingivitis over 5.5 months; and (b) the self-determination theory process model with the intervention and individual differences in autonomy orientation positively predicting project autonomous motivation and increases in perceived dental competence, both of which would be associated with increases in dental behavior, which would, in turn, lead to decreased plaque and gingivitis. METHODS: A randomized two-group experiment was conducted at a dental clinic with 141 patients (Mage = 23.31 years, SD = 3.5), with pre- and postmeasures (after 5.5 months) of motivation variables, dental behaviors, dental plaque, and gingivitis. RESULTS: Overall, the experimental and hypothesized process models received strong support. The effect sizes were moderate for dental behavior, large for autonomous motivation for the project and perceived competence, and very large for perceived autonomy support, dental plaque, and gingivitis. A structural equation model supported the hypothesized process model. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the very large effects on reductions in dental plaque and gingivitis, promoting dental care competence in an autonomy-supportive way, relative to standard care, has important practical implications for dental treatment, home care, and health.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The present study tested the hypotheses that: (a) a dental intervention designed to promote dental care competence in an autonomy-supportive way, relative to standard care, would positively predict perceived clinician autonomy support and patient autonomous motivation for the project, increases in autonomous motivation for dental home care, perceived dental competence, and dental behaviors, and decreases in both dental plaque and gingivitis over 5.5 months; and (b) the self-determination theory process model with the intervention and individual differences in autonomy orientation positively predicting project autonomous motivation and increases in perceived dental competence, both of which would be associated with increases in dental behavior, which would, in turn, lead to decreased plaque and gingivitis. METHODS: A randomized two-group experiment was conducted at a dental clinic with 141 patients (Mage = 23.31 years, SD = 3.5), with pre- and postmeasures (after 5.5 months) of motivation variables, dental behaviors, dental plaque, and gingivitis. RESULTS: Overall, the experimental and hypothesized process models received strong support. The effect sizes were moderate for dental behavior, large for autonomous motivation for the project and perceived competence, and very large for perceived autonomy support, dental plaque, and gingivitis. A structural equation model supported the hypothesized process model. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the very large effects on reductions in dental plaque and gingivitis, promoting dental care competence in an autonomy-supportive way, relative to standard care, has important practical implications for dental treatment, home care, and health.
Authors: Derwin King-Chung Chan; Sophie Xin Yang; Barbara Mullan; Xiumin Du; Xin Zhang; Nikos L D Chatzisarantis; Martin S Hagger Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2014-12-27
Authors: Dean Shumway; Kent A Griffith; Reshma Jagsi; Sheryl G Gabram; Geoffrey C Williams; Ken Resnicow Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2015-07-09 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Francesca A Soldani; Thomas Lamont; Kate Jones; Linda Young; Tanya Walsh; Rizwana Lala; Janet E Clarkson Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-10-31
Authors: Jeffrey T Kullgren; Geoffrey C Williams; Kenneth Resnicow; Lawrence C An; Amy Rothberg; Kevin G Volpp; Michele Heisler Journal: Int J Workplace Health Manag Date: 2016