Literature DB >> 22309727

Positive emotional context eliminates the framing effect in decision-making.

Mathieu Cassotti1, Marianne Habib, Nicolas Poirel, Ania Aïte, Olivier Houdé, Sylvain Moutier.   

Abstract

Dual-process theories have suggested that emotion plays a key role in the framing effect in decision-making. However, little is known about the potential impact of a specific positive or negative emotional context on this bias. We investigated this question with adult participants using an emotional priming paradigm. First, participants were presented with positive or negative affective pictures (i.e., pleasant vs. unpleasant photographs). Afterward, participants had to perform a financial decision-making task that was unrelated to the pictures previously presented. The results revealed that the presentation framed in terms of gain or loss no longer affected subjects' decision-making following specific exposure to emotionally pleasant pictures. Interestingly, a positive emotional context did not globally influence risk-taking behavior but specifically decreased the risk propensity in the loss frame. This finding confirmed that a positive emotional context can reduce loss aversion, and it strongly reinforced the dual-process view that the framing effect stems from an affective heuristic belonging to intuitive System 1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22309727     DOI: 10.1037/a0026788

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emotion        ISSN: 1528-3542


  18 in total

1.  When more is less in financial decision-making: financial literacy magnifies framing effects.

Authors:  Vânia Moreira Costa; Nuno A De Sá Teixeira; Ana Cordeiro Santos; Eduardo Santos
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-06-19

2.  Influence of Environmental Aesthetic Value and Anticipated Emotion on Pro-Environmental Behavior: An ERP Study.

Authors:  Huie Li; Chang You; Jin Li; Mei Li; Min Tan; Guanfei Zhang; Yiping Zhong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  To Blame or Not? Modulating Third-Party Punishment with the Framing Effect.

Authors:  Jiamiao Yang; Ruolei Gu; Jie Liu; Kexin Deng; Xiaoxuan Huang; Yue-Jia Luo; Fang Cui
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 5.271

4.  Does ambiguity aversion influence the framing effect during decision making?

Authors:  Anaïs Osmont; Mathieu Cassotti; Marine Agogué; Olivier Houdé; Sylvain Moutier
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-04

5.  Exploring the relationship between math anxiety and gender through implicit measurement.

Authors:  Orly Rubinsten; Noam Bialik; Yael Solar
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Positivity helps the medicine go down: Leveraging framing and affective contexts to enhance the likelihood to take medications.

Authors:  Alyssa R Minton; Nathaniel A Young; Madeline A Nievera; Joseph A Mikels
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2020-11-12

7.  Link between cognitive neuroscience and education: the case of clinical assessment of developmental dyscalculia.

Authors:  Orly Rubinsten
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Fear and anger have opposite effects on risk seeking in the gain frame.

Authors:  Marianne Habib; Mathieu Cassotti; Sylvain Moutier; Olivier Houdé; Grégoire Borst
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-03-10

9.  The framing effect and skin conductance responses.

Authors:  Patrick Ring
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Stress effects on framed decisions: there are differences for gains and losses.

Authors:  Stephan Pabst; Matthias Brand; Oliver T Wolf
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.